【作者】 毛金玲；

【导师】 周永坤；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 法律（专业学位）， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 证明责任契约是双方当事人通过约定变更证明责任，即当出现真伪不明的情况下，不利后果的承担原本应当由证明责任规范予以规定，通过证明责任契约变更此规定。证明责任契约对于目前我国立法情况而言具有重要意义。由于证明责任的问题既涉及实体法又关乎程序法，相应的，证明责任契约也兼具实体性与程序性。但笔者更倾向于将证明责任契约视为私法契约，而非诉讼契约。并通过“私法自治”论证了证明责任契约的合法性。目前我国《合同法》中既有一般的证明责任规范，也有法定的证明责任规范，但遗憾的是《合同法》中的证明责任规范尚且存在一定的问题，通过证明责任契约可以很好的弥补这一缺陷。针对不同的证明责任规范，证明责任契约具有不同的存在空间和条件。本文结合法条与案例，对证明责任契约进行具体分析，并进一步构建证明责任契约的具体制度，便于证明责任契约在市场经济生活中充分发挥其作用。更多还原

【Abstract】 The contract of the burden of proof is that parties change the burden of proof throughpromising, which is the change of the burden of adverse consequences which should beruled by the law when the facts is unknown. The contract of the burden of proof issignificant to Chinese legislation now. Because the burden of proof is related to both of thesubstantive law and the procedural law, accordingly, the contract of the burden of proofhas the nature of substance and procedure. But in my opinion, the contract of the burden ofproof is a kind of contract in substantive law. Thus, the legitimacy foundation of thecontract of the burden of proof is the principle in civil law “autonomy of private law”. Atpresent, the contract law concludes both average rule on the burden of proof and legal ruleon the burden of proof. Unfortunately the rule on the burden of proof in the contract law isnot good enough, so we can make up the drawbacks through the contract of the burden ofproof. There are different qualifications to contracts of the burden of proof to differentrules on the burden of proof. This paper should analysis the contract of the burden of proofthrough combining rules and cases. Furthermore, to make the contract of the burden ofproof play a role in the market economy, I build the concrete system on the contract of theburden of proof.更多还原