【作者】 鲍燕娇；

【导师】 章志远；

【作者基本信息】 苏州大学 ， 宪法学与行政法学， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 作为一种新型的政府规制手段，公布行政违法事实已经在我国当下诸多行政管理领域得到运用，并为环境保护、食品安全、产品质量及证券监管立法初步认可。其倍受行政机关的青睐，既源于行政执法机关在公益保障与私益侵害之间的权衡，也是传统法律文化中的耻感文化在行政执法活动中的延伸，更与信息规制工具在现代社会治理中的广泛运用息息相关。然而，法律概念用语的模糊、程序及责任规定的缺失，致使公布违法事实手段的运用呈现杂乱无序的格局。依托行政行为形式化原理，可对公布违法事实的法律属性作声誉罚、公共警告、行政处罚结果公开形式及行政强制执行手段的区分。鉴于公布违法事实手段的不当运用容易侵害到行政相对人的合法权益，应当分别从行使条件的拟订、正当程序的遵守和预防性救济机制的建构等三个方面对其进行有效控制，并考虑具体类型的适用特点因“型”制宜。最终，倡导“有节制地运用公布行政违法事实”，使其在发挥正面功效的同时不至产生过多的负面效应。更多还原

【Abstract】 As a new type of government regulation means, publishing the administrative illegalfacts has been applied in many administrative areas in our country and has beenpreliminarily admitted in legislations of environment protection, food safety, productquality and securities supervision. The reasons for its growing popularity amongadministrative organizations are: the trade-off between public security and private interestsinfringed; extension of traditional shame culture in the administrative activities; closelyrelated to the extensive application of information regulation means in modern society.Publishing illegal facts is in disorder because of ambiguous legal terms, lack of stipulationsof procedures and duties. In accordance with formalized administrative acts, illegal factscan be published as punishment against reputation, public warning, the result of publishingadministrative penalties and arbitrary administrative executive methods. Sinceinappropriate application of publishing illegal facts might jeopardize the legal interests ofadministrative counterpart, publishing illegal facts shoud be effectively controlled from thefollowing aspects: drafting applicable conditions, following due process, creatingpreventive relief system and considering the characteristics of different types. At last,advocating "administrative illegal facts published temperately" is to prevent too muchnegative effect.更多还原