【作者】 张海涛；

【导师】 侯和涛； 施刚；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 结构工程， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 加热炉钢结构是带有壁板的框架围护结构,广泛用于石化行业中,目前对这种带壁板钢结构的研究还较少。对石化加热炉钢结构考虑壁板作用的框架柱计算长度系数取值及其壁板加劲肋的布置现有规范没有完善的设计要求,此类结构的抗震性能及破坏机理也需进行全面、深入的试验研究。本文通过有限元软件ANSYS分析得出了石化加热炉带壁板钢结构框架柱计算长度系数的取值规律,对壁板加劲肋进行了优化分析,并通过循环加载试验及有限元模拟对此类结构的抗震性能进行了细致深入的研究,为此类结构的设计和工程应用提供一定参考依据。主要研究内容及成果如下：(1)对一实际工程加热炉两端榀框架结构分别建立了带壁板和纯框架的有限元模型进行分析,计算得到了框架柱的计算长度系数和结构的侧倾刚度,并建议石化加热炉钢结构应考虑壁板对框架柱稳定承载力的有利作用,带壁板框架柱的计算长度宜采用规范中无侧移框架柱的计算长度取值方法,且依然较为安全。(2)对一实际工程石化加热炉辐射段横向边榀三跨建立了有限元模型进行分析计算,得出在顶点施加水平集中荷载作用能够比较理想的模拟整体结构在侧向荷载作用下的变形,合理的加劲肋布置能有效控制壁板的面外变形,保证结构在设计荷载下的使用要求,且壁板不会先于主体结构失效,并选取石化加热炉结构中常用的参数,建立有限元模型进行优化分析,确定了壁板加劲肋的合理布置,为工程设计提供参考。(3)对优化后的加热炉带加劲壁板钢结构足尺模型进行水平反复荷载作用下的试验研究,系统分析结构破坏模式和耗能机理,研究其滞回性能,得到了承载力、刚度、延性和耗能能力等指标。结果表明：该种结构具有良好的延性和耗能性能；钢框架和壁板协同工作良好；加劲肋的设置改善了钢板的实际受力,提高墙体的承载力及刚度,滞回曲线饱满呈“梭形”。结构破坏模式为柱的局部屈曲、柱脚开裂、壁板发生加劲区格内的局部屈曲；底层梁柱连接部位形成塑性铰。(4)运用ANSYS有限元软件分析了石化加热炉带加劲壁板钢结构在循环荷载下的受力性能,并得到了试件的骨架曲线、滞回曲线、应力云图及变形云图。然后对比分析了有限元结果与试验结果,两者吻合较好,因此用ANSYS有限元软件模拟石化加热炉钢结构的受力性能是合理可行的。更多还原

【Abstract】 Heating furnace steel structures are framework envelope structures with wall panel. These structures have begun to be applied in petrochemical industry, while in China the related research just begins. When we consider the wall effect there is no perfect design theory for effective length of frame column and wall stiffener optimization layout. In order to obtain the seismic performance and failure mechanism of such structures we need to conduct a comprehensive and in-depth test research.In this paper the finite element software ANSYS was used to study the laws of effective length of frame column and the optimized design of stiffener. Cyclic loading test was carried out on the heating furnace steel structures and then the finite element simulation was conducted. The research would provide reference for the design and engineering applications of such structures. The main contents and results are as follows:(1) Two edge pin frameworks of the furnace steel structure were established with the finite element model. By the eigenvalue buckling analysis, we got the effective length and the roll stiffness of frame column. We studied that we should consider the beneficial effect of wall panel. The effective length of frame column was closer to the calculation value of frame without sideways according to the code, and was still relatively safe.(2) The finite element models were established for calculation and analysis in this paper. Applying horizontal concentrated load to the top could well simulate the deformation of the whole structure under the lateral load. Reasonable layout of stiffeners could control the out-of-plane deformation of wall panels effectively. Wall panel would not fail before the main structure and ensure the function of the structure under design load. We selected common parameters of petrochemical heating furnace to establish the finite element model. The rational layout of stiffeners was determined through the analysis, providing a reference for engineering design. (3) A one-bay steel frame full scale model with stiffened steel wall panel was tested under low-frequency cyclic loads.Based on the experiment, the failure mode and energy dissipation mechanism of the structure were analyzed with regard to the load carrying capacity, ductility, stiffness and energy dissipation capacity. The results showed that the specimen exhibited excellent ductility and energy dissipation capacity. The stiffeners improved the work condition of the steel panels and increased the stiffness and load-carrying capacity of the panels. The hysteresis loop present "spindle" curve. The failure mode of the structure was induced by local buckling and crack of the column and local buckling of the infill panels, plastic hinges were formed at the bottom connection of the column-beam. The experiment results provide a basis for engineering application of this structure system.(4)The finite element software ANSYS was used to simulate the stress performance of heating furnace steel structure under low-frequency cyclic loads. Then we got the specimen skeleton curve, hysteresis curve, the stress cloud and the deformation cloud pictures. The finite element results were in good agreement with the test results. So the ANSYS finite element simulation was reasonable.更多还原