【作者】 闫更宁；

【导师】 陈金钊；

【作者基本信息】 山东大学 ， 法律（专业学位）， 2013， 硕士

【摘要】 司法政策是公共政策在司法中的运用,是公共权威对司法活动进行宏观调控的手段,它为解决司法问题而生,是特定时期建筑在司法领域并连接国家权威和一线司法的桥梁。我国建国以来,政策在司法中的地位经历了不小的变化,但时至今日,政策对司法的作用依然举足轻重。究其原因,我国司法系统的政治职能必然决定了国家政策在司法领域的延伸,我国法律体系的不够健全也使得司法政策有其存在的必要性。因此,有人提出,我国司法现状应当是“以法律和司法政策为准绳”,而非仅仅是“以法律为准绳”,可见司法政策在司法活动中的重要性。然而在现实中,我国司法政策体系混乱,存在表述含糊、有失逻辑、泛政治化的现象,在上下传递过程中不免出现信息失真、落实走样的问题,甚至还出现了借司法政策为名违背法治理念、任意歪曲法律以求地方政治目的的恶果。而在理论上,我国学者大多是就某一阶段的热点司法政策进行论述,少有对司法政策做专门研究,以至我国司法政策理论研究仍处于起步阶段。另外,由于我国司法资源薄弱,法官整体能力不足,致使司法政策的失范在实践中被无限放大。因此,司法政策规范亟待研究。幸而近几年司法政策理论研究的重要性逐渐引起重视,少数学者也发表了对其基础理论的探讨,使得司法政策作为一个独立而热门的研究对象呈现在理论界。因此,笔者借此机遇,在借鉴学者们对各时期热点司法政策的研究方法之上,对司法政策的基础理论作出探讨,在总结归纳我国司法政策的特征、功能、分类等问题的同时,结合司法政策的现状,分析司法政策在特征、功能、各类别中存在的利弊,并对司法政策在制定和执行中应当注重的问题和发展方向提出自己的见解。另外,由于司法政策理论研究存在一定程度的空白,本文在结合各单项司法政策研究,归纳司法政策基础理论的论证方法上有一定的创新性。本文第一部分导论为司法政策的基本理论问题研究综述,主要介绍我国司法政策基本理论问题的研究现状、我国司法政策的现存问题,以及本课题的研究意义、研究方法及研究思路。第二部分在例举对司法政策的定义的各种表述之基础上,通过分析和比较,对司法政策的定义作出界定。第三部分结合我国司法政策的现实状况,总结归纳我国司法政策的特征,同时分析司法政策在特征上体现出的其存在的利弊。第四部分结合我国政治与司法的关系,以及司法系统的职能,阐述我国司法政策的功能,同时分析司法政策在功能上体现出的利弊。第五部分通过分析司法政策与刑事政策等概念的位阶关系,根据不同司法政策产生或作用的方式不同,归纳我国实践中司法政策的类别,对不同类别的司法政策容易产生的弊端予以分析。第六部分通过对对以上各部分的总结,结合我国司法实践和实际情况,提出我国司法政策的发展方向,并提出如何规范我国司法政策的制定模式、制定环节、制定主体、制定标准等方面,是全文的重点介绍部分。更多还原

【Abstract】 Judicial policy is the application of public policy in judicial field, and is a kind of macroeconomic regulation and control means to control the judicial activities by the public authority in a country. It is bom to solve the problem of justice, and to connect the judicial authority with the front judicial field in specific periods. Since the founding of our country, the position of judicial policy has experienced a big change, but today justice is still greatly influenced by policy. The reason is that the political function of the judicial system in our country decided the extension of national policy in the field of justice, and imperfect legal system in our country makes the judicial policy has its necessity of existence. Therefore, someone puts forward to the judicial present situation in our country should be’to the legal and judicial policy as the criterion", rather than merely’taking law as the criterion’, to show the importance of judicial policy in judicial activities. In reality, however, the judicial policy system in our country is disordered, there are problems as ambiguity, lacking of logic, politicalization on it’s statement, which make distortion in the process of passing information unavoidable, and the precise practice unable. Someone even lends the judicial policy’s name against the rule of law concept, misinterprets the law in order to achieve local political purposes. In theory, Chinese scholars mostly discuss on hot judicial policies, rare to do specialized research in judicial policy, so that the theory research of judicial policy in our country is still in its infancy. In addition, due to the weakness of judicial resources in our country, and the insufficient of the judges’ overall ability, the specification of judicial policy is infinite expanded in practice. Therefore, the judicial policy specification needs to be research. Fortunately, the importance of judicial policy theory research gets gradually attention in recent years, few scholars have published the study on its basic theory, makes the judicial policy as an independent object of study present in the theoretical circle. So I avail ourselves of this opportunity, in reference to the methods of scholars in the researching of the hot judicial policies, to investigate the basic theory of judicial policy.By summarizing the features, function, classification of judicial policy issues, this essay analyses the advantages and disadvantages of judicial policy, and put forward my own opinions to the problems in development and implementation of judicial policy. In addition, because the judicial policy theory study has a certain degree of blank, in this paper, in combination with individual judicial policy research, inductive reasoning methods on the basic theories of judicial policy has certain innovative.The first part is literature review of judicial policy’s basic theories research, mainly introduces the present situation and existing problems in the basic theory research of the judicial policy in our country, and the research significance, methods and ideas in this topic. In the second part, on the basic of illustrating the definition statements of judicial policy, through analysis and comparison, to define the concept of judicial policy. The third part sums up the characteristics of judicial policy in our country, at the same time analysis the advantages and disadvantages of judicial policy in it’s characteristic reflection. The fourth part elaborates the function of judicial policy in our country, according to the relationship between politics and the justice in our country, and the function of our judicial system. At the same time, this part analysis the advantages and disadvantages of judicial policy in it’s function reflection.Fifth part summarizes the practice categories of judicial policy, by analyzing the status relations between the concept of judicial policy and the criminal policy, according to the different judicial policies or action in different ways.Sixth part proposes the development direction of judicial policy in our country through reviewing each part above and the judicial practice in our country, and puts forward how to standardizing judicial policy in our country by making scientific pattern, process, standards, etc. This part is the most important one of the full text.更多还原