【作者】 肖彦；

【导师】 孙晖；

【作者基本信息】 大连理工大学 ， 城市规划与设计， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 二战之后,以现代主义为主导的西方城市物质空间规划与设计,推崇城市秩序下的简单功能主义,抹杀了城市的多样性和复杂性,城市内部越发像一部没有生命的机器。大规模的城市建设运动打破了长久以来自发形成的城市格局,使城市的复杂性不断遗失。如今,我国也迎来了快速城市化和大规模的城市建设时期。在追求城市经济效益的同时,粗鲁而简单、机械而单一功能导向下的城市建设和改造,将毁掉城市的多样性和复杂性,也将毁掉城市活力。非人性化的尺度、闭塞的空间将影响人与人之间的社会交往,导致城市发展空间的严重失控。面对这种局面,本文尝试以复杂性科学的视角对以亚历山大和萨林加罗斯为代表的西方现代城市设计复杂性理论的发展脉络进行梳理。解决如何在复杂性科学与人性化城市设计之间建立起联系,从而指导我国的城市设计实践工作,创造生机勃勃的城市,营造和谐健康、充满活力的人居环境。本文将对亚历山大和萨林加罗斯相关的城市设计复杂性理论进行比较研究,从理论背景、方法论、对城市系统复杂性的认识这几方面入手,对他们理论思想的传承、发展和共性等方面进行总结,从而理清西方现代城市复杂性理论的发展脉络,为我国的城市建设提供现实、合理、长效的城市设计策略和指导原则。论文主要由四大部分组成,第一部分为绪论,明确课题的研究对象和研究意义,并对本文的研究范围进行界定。第二部分为亚历山大和萨林加罗斯的相关理论综述。第三部分为本文的主体部分,主要分为三章,分别从方法论、对城市系统结构复杂性的认识和对建筑与城市设计语汇的认识这几个方面对他们二人的理论进行比较研究。最后一部分为结论与展望,包括对本次研究的总结以及研究不足与展望。更多还原

【Abstract】 After World War II, the simple functionalism of western physical spatial planning was espoused by modernists, derived from the conception that a city is a machine. The rapid development of urban construction destroyed the urban form arisen more or less spontaneously over many years, leading to the lacking of urban diversity and complexity. At present, our country is facing its rapid urbanization and development of urban construction, such simple-mechanized urban design that only seek economic benefit badly destroyed urban vitality and urban complexity. As a result, the inhumane scale and enclosed spaces will inevitably lead to serious problems in the interaction between people and the vitality of urban spaces.This paper attempts to deal with the urban complexity theory, represented as Alexander’s and Salingaros’s, from the perspective of the complexity science when faced with this sort of situation. The author tries to make connections between humanized urban design and complexity science, so as to launch the practice of urban design in our country and to improve the urban environment.With the purpose of gaining a clear idea of the history of western modern urban complexity theory and giving suggestions on Chinese urban construction, the author present an comparative analysis of urban complexity theory of Alexander’s and Salingaros’s in aspects of theoretical background, methodology and their knowledge of urban system complexity.This paper includes four parts. Part one introduces the background of Alexander’s and Salingaros’s urban complexity theory, including the brief introduction of the two persons, the background of western modern urban complexity theory and so on. Part two basically introduces their works and papers on urban complexity theory. Part three dicusses the development and transformation of their theory, in the perspective of methodology and their knowledge of urban system complexity. The final part gives the conclusion of this research.更多还原