我国反垄断法私人诉讼制度研究

【作者】 邓静；

【导师】 陈兰兰；

【作者基本信息】 北方工业大学 ， 法律， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 反垄断法的目的是保护公平自由的市场竞争秩序,从而更好的遏制垄断行为,对市场竞争秩序的维护起着举足轻重的作用。目前世界上有100多个国家制定了反垄断法,对于维护自由竞争的市场秩序,促进其健康发展发挥了重要作用,但不同国家的实施情况则有差异。如美国通过100多年的立法实践和探索,发展并完善了反垄断法,确立和巩固了以政府反垄断执法机关为主体,私人执行为补充的反垄断法实施机制。美国反垄断私人实施的实践证明：私人的反垄断实施对促进反垄断法的发展,遏制垄断行为,维护市场竞争起着不可取代的作用。我国反垄断法私人诉讼一直被忽略,本文所指反垄断法私人诉讼主要是指私人对垄断行为进行的诉讼。虽然我国《反垄断法》于2008年实施,但对反垄断法私人诉讼仅作出概括的规定,体现在该法的第50条：如果经营者因为实施垄断行为,而给其他经营者造成损失的,应当依法承担民事责任。该法对于如何实施反垄断私人诉讼没有具体规定。与传统的民事诉讼制度相比,反垄断法私人诉讼制度有其独特的意义和价值,在我国建立反垄断法私人诉讼的相关制度非常有必要。本文对美国、日本、德国等国反垄断法私人诉讼的起诉资格、损害赔偿、管辖权确立等方面制度进行比较研究,在此基础上提出完善我国反垄断法私人诉讼制度的建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 The purpose of the antitrust laws is to protect free and fair competition in the market order, in order to better curb the monopolistic conduct. The antitrust laws play important role in the maintenance of order of market competition. More than100countries have established anti-monopoly law to play its due role in the maintenance of free competition in the market order, and promote their healthy development, but the implementation of the different countries are different. Such as the United States through100years of legislative practice and exploration, development and improve the anti-monopoly law to establish and consolidate the implementation mechanism of the Government’s anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies, private enforcement to supplement the antitrust laws. U.S. antitrust private implementation of the Practice has proved that:private antitrust implementation plays an irreplaceable role in promoting the development of anti-monopoly law to curb monopolistic conduct and maintain competition in the market.China’s private anti-trust litigation that has been neglected, this article refers to the anti-monopoly law private cause of action mainly refers to private anticompetitive conduct of litigation. Although China’s "anti-monopoly law was implemented in2008, but only to make general provisions on private anti-trust litigation, which is reflected in the article50:If the operator because the implementation of monopolistic conduct, and to other operators losses, shall bear civil liability, but the method how to antitrust private lawsuit is not specified. Compared with the traditional civil litigation system, private anti-trust litigation system has its own unique meaning and value. So in our country the establishment of private anti-trust litigation system is very necessary.In this paper, the United States, Japan, Germany and other private lawsuit of antitrust law to Sue, damages, jurisdiction establishment was studied by comparison, and based on this, suggestions were put forward to perfect our private lawsuit system of antitrust law.更多还原