【作者】 张哲；

【导师】 陈志英；

【作者基本信息】 华中师范大学 ， 宪法学与行政法学， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 基层人民法庭是我国司法救济的“最前线”,为什么它的纠纷解决机制让人有研究思考的兴趣?一是,基层人民法院的基层人民法庭在司法实践中解决纠纷的“独特性”、“灵活性”以及“习惯性”让人印象深刻；二是,司法理论(这里指国家颁布的法律正条所指示的直接内容)中规定性的办案方式、方法与现实状态下的基层法官的具体办案的“不同性”让人印象深刻；三是,基层司法纠纷解决之后,民众对纠纷本身所引发的规则理解的“差异性”让人印象深刻。本文以制度分析为框架、以行动研究和心理活动为方法,对当代中国基层司法纠纷解决的现状、制度以及法官和民众对纠纷解决所产生的反作用影响,分别从纠纷解决的一般理论框架、纠纷解决的运行轨迹、纠纷解决的司法功能、纠纷解决的矛盾反思四个方面展开论述,最后对现行的基层人民法庭纠纷解决机制为我国法治事业的贡献上,提出了一些让人思考的改革性问题。引言对研究问题和研究背景作了简要的交代,并引入制度分析的理论框架和行动研究方法。文章的第一部分主要从纠纷解决本身的路径里去把握纠纷解决的一般性理论基础,从纠纷解决本原和本性出发,分析和归纳了纠纷解决机制的一般类型和模式。文章的第二部分以法律实务中具体的某某人民法庭为参照系,客观详细的描述了一个基层人民法庭运行的全部轨迹。文章的第三部分主要从司法的功能着手,在说明为什么当下国家把基层司法的“社会效果“放在首位的同时也反思了一部分长期以来让法学界(特别是研究基层司法领域的学界)担心的问题。文章的第四部分在反思基层司法纠纷解决功能性基础之上,又以在基层司法裁判过程中的一个实例反映出制定法与基层社会习惯的不相融性来进一步的探讨民事习惯在司法纠纷解决过程中所起到的微妙作用。另外,还提出了一个比较引人关注的问题即在当下中国基层司法实践中法治的精神理念(具体指国家立法者在制定法中所表现出来的理念)应该如何贯穿在民众的心中,让其根深蒂固,茁壮成长。更多还原

【Abstract】 The grass-roots people’s court of judicial relief "confrontation" of its dispute resolution mechanism for people to have interest in research thinking? First, the "uniqueness" of grass-roots people’s courts of the grassroots people’s courts to resolve disputes in the judicial practice, the "flexibility" and "habitual" is impressive;, judicial theory (in this case issued by the State law is direct instructions) in the provisions for crime, the real state level judges handling the case of "different" is impressive;, grassroots judicial dispute resolution, the public arising from the dispute itself rules to understand the "difference" is impressive. System analysis framework, the method of action and mental activity, the status of contemporary Chinese grass-roots judicial dispute resolution system and the judges and the public on settling disputes arising from the reaction, the general theoretical framework for dispute resolution, dispute solve the running track, the function of judicial dispute resolution, dispute resolution contradictions reflect on four aspects of discourse, and finally the existing grass-roots people’s court dispute settlement mechanism for the contribution to the cause of China’s rule of law, some people think about reform. Introduction to research questions and research background gave a brief explanation, and the introduction of the theoretical framework of institutional analysis and action research methods.The first part of dispute resolution path to go to grasp the general theoretical basis for dispute resolution, starting from the origin and nature of dispute resolution, analysis and summarizes the dispute resolution mechanism of the general type and mode.In the second part of certain people’s courts in legal practice as a frame of reference, objective and detailed description of all the trajectory of a grass-roots people’s courts run.The third part is to proceed from the functioning of justice, why the present state of the "social effects" of the grassroots judicial first place at the same time to reflect on the part of the long-standing jurisprudence (especially of academics in the field of research and grassroots judicial) to worry about problem.Fourth reflect grass-roots judicial disputes to resolve functional basis of an instance, especially in the primary administration of justice process reflects the incompatibility of Law and grass-roots social habits to further explore the civil habits in judicial disputes solve the delicate role to play in the process. Also, the concept of a cause for concern that the current judicial practice of the Chinese grass-roots spirit of the rule of law concept (specifically referring to national legislators in the statute) should be run through in the hearts of the people, let deep-rooted, grow.更多还原