【作者】 姚辉；

【导师】 周国林；

【作者基本信息】 华中师范大学 ， 历史文献学， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 杨树达和杨伯峻叔侄都对《论语》进行了注疏,并各自取得了巨大成绩。在对《论语》的注释过程中,杨伯峻的《论语译注》吸取了杨树达《论语疏证》中许多方法和观点。本文主要从体例、注疏特点、观点和引书四个方面对《论语疏证》和《论语译注》进行比较和研究。本论文绪论部分,主要论述选题缘由、国内外研究现状和研究方法。构成论文的主体有五个版块。第一,主要叙述杨树达和杨伯峻的生平及学术成就,并阐述《论语疏证》和《论语译注》的成书过程。第二,主要涉及对《论语疏证》和《论语译注》两书的体例,并对其体例进行比较。第三,主要分别研究论述了《论语疏证》和《论语译注》两书的注疏特点,并对其特点进行比较。第四,将两书中的具体注释内容进行比较,包括《论语译注》完全引用杨树达之观点、两书中注释相同之处和两书中注释不同之处三个部分。第五,对两书中的引书做出研究,通过同一篇章中所引相同书目、两书共同引用书目和《论语译注》较《论语疏证》多引书目三个表格来对他们各自所引书目进行比较研究。最后是结论、余论以及参考文献。余论中主要论述了杨树达和杨伯峻二人对《论语》的注疏在《论语》研究中的地位。更多还原

【Abstract】 Yang shuda and his nephew Yang bojun both annotated The Analects, and each has made great achievements.In the annotation process of The Analects, Yang Bojun "The Annotation of The Analects " draws on many of the methods and perspectives in the Yang Shuda "The Analects of Confucius Shu Zheng".In this paper, I will compare and research "The Annotation of The Analects" and "The Analects of Confucius Shu Zheng" from the Commentaries characteristics, views and four cit.The First-up chapter is the introduction and it Discusses the topics of reason, research status, ideas and innovations.The first chapter describes the life and scholarship of the Yang Shuda and Yang Bojun,and the writing process.of "The Annotation of The Analects" and "The Analects of Confucius Shu Zheng"The second chapter ismainly involvedin the style of the two books of "The Annotation of The Analects" and "The Analects of Confucius Shu Zheng" and compares of their style.The third chapter studiesand discusses the the Commentaries characteristics of the two books of "The Annotation of The Analects" and "The Analects of Confucius Shu Zheng",and compares of their feature.The fourth chapter compares of their views, Including "The Annotation of The Analects" full reference the view of Yang Shuda and The same view of the two books and The different view of the two booksThe fifth chapter researchs their cits by three tables of the same chapter in the same bibliographic,of two books of common reference bibliography and of The "Analects Annotation" rather than "The Analects of Confucius Shu Zheng," Multi-lead bibliographic.Finally,it is the the remaining contention and References.In the remaining contention,I will dicuss their place in the research of The Analects.更多还原