【作者】 马晓杰；

【导师】 麻宝斌；

【作者基本信息】 吉林大学 ， 公共治理与公共政策， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 20世纪90年代以来，经济全球化深入发展，信息技术快速进步，历史的车轮推动着人们进入剧变的治理时代。在当今世界，跨越边界的事情经常发生，包罗组织边界、专业边界、文化边界甚至地理边界。人类面临着全球变暖、人口膨胀、恐怖组织等复杂问题，这些问题不能仅仅依靠单个力量来解决。瞬息万变的组织环境，扁平化、网络化的组织形式，治理中多个主体的异军突起都在考验着公共领导者和公共组织治理的能力，公共领导者必须跨越多个边界和多重主体共同管辖，才能更好地组织社会关系、增进社会利益最大化或管理共同的问题。然而，已有的领导方式官本位思想依然浓厚、引导公民参与意识不强、对自身角色没有清晰的定位。这一矛盾导致公共领导者不能适应合作、平等、网络化和多中心并存的治理时代所带来的变化，公共组织环境和社会环境的变化要求领导者转变自己思维观念和价值观，走向新型领导模式。本文提出的共享型领导是在前人研究基础上，融合了治理时代的要求提出的新型领导。它以公共精神为前提，以合作思维为核心，以价值观管理为工具，以共享学习为内在要求，以批判精神为发展动力，强调正确处理组织间的关系、促成合作，充分创建并维护价值这一权威基础，追求融合多个治理主体利益的共同绩效。共享型领导的理念与治理时代的要求是一致的。两者都承认多元化的治理主体，并且认为这些治理主体是平等的，都是追求合作的，都认为网络化的治理结构更利于公共问题的解决和公共利益的实现。提出共享型领导并不是解决问题的办法，文章在最后部分提出了走向共享型领导的路径。共享型领导的实现存在约束条件和现实障碍，想要实现这一模型，必须克服这些障碍。为了更好的研究领导个体思维、观念的变化，为领导者提供可执行的实现方法，本文假设组织条件和公民社会是相对完善的。领导者应该培养合作共赢、系统整合思维，转变价值观念、培育公共精神，包容并学习不同思维优势、融合中西思维、发扬女性思维优势，完善技能三角、增强谈判能力。本文提出的共享型领导也仅仅是回应治理环境的一种尝试和探讨，能否有效推动公共利益的实现、公共问题的解决还有待实践的检验。更多还原

【Abstract】 Since the1990s, in-depth development of economic globalization and rapidadvances in information technology, the wheel of history promoted people into thegovernance era. In today’s world, things across the border often occur, whichinclude the organizational boundaries, professional boundaries, culturalboundaries and even the boundaries of the ground. With humans facing globalwarming, overpopulation, terrorist organizations and other complex problems,these problems cannot rely solely on the single force. The rapidly changingorganizational environment, flat and networked forms of organization, andMulti-agent governance test the public leaders and the capability of publicorganizational governance. The public leaders must span multiple boundaries andmultiple subjects to better organize social relations, maximize the interests of thecommunity and manage the common problems. However, the existing leadershipand the official standard thinking are still strong; The civic participation is notstrong; the positions of their roles is not clear. This contradiction makes the publicleaders not to adapt the changes, which were brought by the governance era ofcooperation, equality, networking and the coexistence of multi-center. Changes ofthe public organization environment of and Social environment require the leadersto change their Innovative concepts and values, and then guide them toward a newmodel of leadership.Based on the previous studies, shared leadership integrated the governancerequirements of the times are proposed as a new type of leadership. The newleadership keeps the public spirit as the precondition, sees cooperative thinking asthe core, uses values as the management tools, keeps shared learning as theinherent requirements and sees critical spirit as the power. The new leadershipemphasizes that leaders should handle inter-organizational relations correctly, andpromotes cooperation, and creates and maintains the value of this authoritativebasis, pursuit the common performance with the interests of the multiple governance bodies. The concept of shared leadership and the requirements ofgovernance era are consistent. Both recognized the pluralistic governance bodies,and think the governance bodies are equal and pursuit of cooperation, and believethat the network-based governance structure is more conducive to publicproblem-solving and the implementation of the public interest.The shared leadership is not the solution to the problem. The last part of thepaper presents paths towards shared leadership. There are many constraints andpractical obstacles to the implementation of shared leadership. If you want toachieve this model, you must overcome these obstacles. In order to study theindividual thinking of the leadership and changes in concept, and provideexecutable methods for the leaders, this paper assumes that the organizationalconditions and civil society is relatively well. The leaders should develop abilitiesin different aspects, such as win-win cooperation, systems integration thinking,and changes of the values, public spirit, and the negotiating capacity.The shared leadership presented in his paper is only an attempt to responsethe governance environment. Whether the shared leadership effectively promotesthe realization of the public interest and solves public problem, are yet to be testedin practice.更多还原