【作者】 丁同玉；

【导师】 靳相木；

【作者基本信息】 浙江大学 ， 土地资源管理， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 自21世纪初始,我国集体建设用地流转逐渐由严格禁止阶段进入规范流转阶段。这使得我国集体建设用地用益物权体系的建立与完善有了现实需要。与此同时,部分专家学者提倡集体与国有建设用地应“同地同权同价”。那么,这一主张是否合理可行呢?在此情形下,对这一问题的分析研究,就显得十分迫切,有着重要的现实意义与丰富的理论意义。基于上述研究背景与目的,本文在我国实行社会主义的土地公有制(即土地的国家所有制和集体所有制并存)的制度前提下,以及集体与国有建设用地均可自由入市流转的假设前提下,分别运用文献调查法、比较分析法、案例分析法及定性分析与定量分析相结合等方法,尝试回答如下几个问题：集体建设用地与国有建设用地使用权能否实现“同权”?集体建设用地与国有建设用地能否实现“同价”?集体建设用地上可建立何种形式的用益物权制度?在深入探究现有问题形成的根源与本质,并开创性地结合土地制度形成、物权法理论、价格形成机制等多方面知识体系展开分析论述后,本文主要得出了如下研究结论：在本文制度前提与假设前提下,集体与国有两类建设用地无法实现“同地同权同价”,应尝试建立符合我国集体建设用地自身性质的用益物权制度。更多还原

【Abstract】 From the early21st century, China’s collective construction land circulation steps from the strictly prohibited stage into the standardization stage gradually, which makes it necessary to establish the usufruct system of collective construction land. Meanwhile, some experts and scholars promote "same land, same right, same price" between collective construction land and state-owned construction land. So, is it reasonable and realistic? In this case, the analysis and research of the issue looks very urgent and has both important practical significance and rich theoretical significance.Based on the above background and purpose and on condition of socialist public ownership of land and the hypothesis that both collective and state-owned construction land can be circulated in free market, utilizing methods of literature review, comparative analysis, case study, and qualitative and quantitative analysis, this thesis trys to answer the following questions:Should the collective construction land and the state-owned construction land have the same use right? Should the price of use right between the collective construction land and the state-owned construction land be the same during the circulation? Which form of usufructuary right system may be established on the collective construction land?After probing into the causes and nature of the problems’ formation and creatively dissertating the questions combining with various aspects of knowledge systems, such as the formation of the land system, theory of property law, price formation mechanism and so on, this thesis draws out the following conclusions:on the condition of the land system and hypothesis, on the one hand, the collective construction land and the state-owned construction land can’t have the same use right and the price of use right between the collective construction land and the state-owned construction land can’t be the same during the circulation; on the other hand, it is needful to try to establish a usufructuary right system in line with the nature of the collective construction land.更多还原