【作者】 韩露露；

【导师】 吴东镐；

【作者基本信息】 延边大学 ， 宪法学与行政法学， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 在现代法治国家的大背景下,政府行政管理涉及到越来越多的领域,行政自由裁量权也大量出现,这在行政处罚领域表现得成为地突出。行政处罚裁量权的存在虽然保证了行政行为的灵活性与能动性,但过于宽泛的裁量同样可能导致恣意与专断。因此,依法规范与控制行政权力已经成为行政法治的核心。依法规范行政处罚裁量权势在必行,但仅靠立法机关来预设一切可能情况并不现实,因此一个作为行政机关内部的规则之治,并且通过解释和细化法律所形成的行政处罚裁量基准制度应运而生,而且成为了中国行政法理论界和实务界共同关注的一个问题之一。它不仅是沟通抽象法律与个案之间的有效媒介,而且具有较强的可操作性。裁量基准制度主要是通过规则细化来压缩行政裁量的空间,借助具体的、明确的规则来抑制行政裁量的滥用。行政处罚领域存在着大量的行政裁量,行政处罚裁量基准的设立对于规范行政处罚,引导行政处罚向更加科学、民主和公正的方向发展会发挥重要作用。本文主要采用了实证分析和比较的方法对行政处罚裁量基准的相关问题进行研究和分析：通过列举我国各地制定的行政处罚裁量基准制度,并进行比较,找出这些机关或部门在制定基准时所存在的问题,洞悉相关制度目前的缺陷和不足,以解决中国问题为研究的落脚点,为我国行政处罚裁量基准的制定获取新的思路。本文在第一章中明确了行政处罚裁量的研究目的,意义以及研究现状和存在问题；第二章对行政处罚裁量基准进行了概述。首先提出行政处罚裁量权及其限制,然后引申出行政处罚裁量基准；最后进一步地明确了制定行政处罚裁量基准的意义；第三章中首先列出我国各地的立法状况,然后分析其存在的问题并加以分析；在第四章当中提出了自己的建议和想法,从而使我国的行政处罚裁量基准更加地完善。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the modern countries under the rule of background, the government administrative management involves more and more fields, administrative discretion also appear in large Numbers in the administrative penalty area, behaved become outstanding. Administrative punishments although the existence of administrative umpirage ensures the administrative act with initiative, but the flexibility of the too wide discretion also may cause chops and arbitrary。Therefore, to standardize and control administrative power has become the core of the administrative law. To standardize administrative punishment descretion imperative, but only on the legislature to default everything possible case is not reality, so a as administrative organs for internal rules, and through the explanation and refined by the formation of the administrative punishment law benchmark system emerged, and discretion to become the country’s administrative law theory and practice for a common concern of the issue. It is not only the communication between law arid abstraction of effective media case, and has strong operability.Discretion is primarily through rules benchmark system of administrative discretion to compress thinning, with the help of concrete, space defined rules to curb the abuse of administrative discretion. Administrative penalty area there is a lot of administrative discretion, administrative penalty discretion to standardize the benchmark set up administrative punishments, guide administrative punishment to a more scientific, democratic and fair direction will play an important role.This paper mainly adopts empirical analysis and comparison of the method of administrative punishments benchmark some problems concerning the discretion of research and analysis:By listing all China enacted the administrative penalty of discretion, and benchmark system compared to find those organs or departments draft when problems existing in the benchmark and discern the defects and related system currently insufficient, in order to solve the problem of China for research for our country administrative punishment foothold, the benchmark for new discretion formulated ideas.In the first chapter, this paper made clear in the administrative penalty discretion, significance and the research purpose research status and existing problems; The second chapter of administrative penalty discretion benchmark are summarized. First proposed administrative punishment descretion and limits, and then extended out administrative penalty discretion benchmark; Finally further explicitly formulated the significance of administrative penalty discretion benchmark;The third chapter first list all over the country, and then analyzes its legislative situation existing problems and analyzed; In the fourth chapter of Suggestions are put forward and the idea, in order to enable our administrative penalty discretion more perfect benchmark.更多还原