节点文献

在制度与资源之间:失地农民的维权理性

Sandwiched between Resources and Institutions: Rational Rights of Land-expropriated Farmers

【作者】 吴冰洁

【导师】 贾应生;

【作者基本信息】 西北师范大学 , 社会学, 2011, 硕士

【副题名】以X县S镇失地农民维权为例

【摘要】 本文以S镇失地农民维权行动为研究对象,从他们拥有的资源和制度环境入手,来探讨失地农民维权的原因和行动方式。失地农民在失地过程并非被动接受,而是采取各种主动的策略进行维权。他们在有限的制度环境和资源环境下,借助于上一级政府的政策、主流话语、社会道义等将自己的行动联结在合法框架中,来建构制度空间和资源环境,以使自己的行动具有合法性和正当性。任何行动都不是一成不变的,笔者通过对失地农民的维权行动分析,发现失地农民具有明显的风险规避意识,采取灵活的风险规避性的行动。当维权风险大于所得利益的时候,他们会中止当前的行动而寻求另一种可达到利益目的的理性,即失地农民在制度和资源之间采取理性策略来维护自己的利益,在制度和资源之间寻找平衡点以支持其维权行动。

【Abstract】 Started from their own resources and the institutional environment, this paperdiscussed the reasons and actions of the rights of land-expropriated farmers, theresearch object were the activities of land-expropriated farmers of S Town.Land-expropriated farmers were not passively accepted in the process ofland-expropriation; instead they took a variety of strategies. Under the system oflimited institutional environment and environmental conditions, they constructed thesystem space and resources environment so that their actions have legitimacy bymeans of a policy of last government, the mainstream discourse, moral and othersocial links to their actions in the legal framework. No action is static, the author offinally concluded that when risk aversion is greater than the risk from the interests ofrights, they will abort the current action for the interests of another rational purpose.That is, land-expropriated farmers a rational strategies to protect their own interestsbetween system and resources, they find a balance between resources and system tosupport their operations.

节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络