【作者】 陈海澜；

【导师】 李红海；

【作者基本信息】 华中科技大学 ， 法律， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 目前,陷阱取证方式备受关注,虽然该取证方式来源于刑事上的“诱惑侦查”,但是随着社会经济的发展,陷阱取证被人们逐渐应用到行政执法领域和民事领域。由于我国尚未对此方式做出任何的规定,从而引发学术界以及社会对此方式的广泛争论。鉴于此,我们需要对陷阱取证方式进行仔细的分析与定性,并相互比较。所以,本文正是基于此,在结合经典案例并对陷阱取证进行界定的基础上,分别从行政的角度、民事的角度以及刑事的角度,从它们的合理性、合法性以及价值选择的角度进行仔细的分析,从而得出,陷阱取证在民事上是可以接受的,在行政和刑事上是绝对禁止的。更多还原

【Abstract】 At present, there is a widespread concern about the trap of evidence which comes from the“entrapping investigation”of the theory of criminal. However, with the social and economic development, trap evidence has been increasingly applied to the field of civil and administrative field. Since any of the provision has not been clearly made by china, it has caused widespread debate in the academia and the community. So, we need have a careful analysis and qualitative on the trap of evidence. In view of that, on the basis of combining classic cases and clarifying the basic concepts about the trap of evidence, from the perspective of administrative law, civil law and criminal law, from the rationality, the legality, values and the balancing of interests, we can get that the trap of evidence in civil law is acceptable, and is absolutely prohibited in the administrative and criminal area.更多还原