【作者】 刘畅；

【导师】 吴葱；

【作者基本信息】 天津大学 ， 建筑历史与理论， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 考古学与建筑遗产测绘研究同是调查与研究物质文化遗产,但是当今两者的境遇却不尽相同。由于管理体制与学科体系的原因,本应殊途同归的两类科研活动却存在不同程度的隔阂。本文借鉴欧洲“建筑考古学”的经验,通过对考古学与建筑遗产测绘研究关系的探讨,提升记录工作在建筑史研究与遗产保护事业中的地位,重点将现代考古学的观点与层位学、类型学等方法引入建筑遗产记录中。测绘不仅是对建筑遗产的客观描述,还需要记录者对建筑遗产的理解与认识,这种分析性记录正是体现着其考古学特征。文物主管部门、研究者、工程技术人员能够将测绘研究工作视为一种调查与研究地面建筑遗产的考古活动,用考古的眼光与态度看待地面建筑遗存,从而完善测绘研究的工作体系。更多还原

【Abstract】 Archaeology and survey and research of standing historic buildings are both for investigating and researching the material cultural heritage, but today they are not in the same situation in China. Because of the different systems of the administrative management and disciplinary classification, there are varying degrees of gaps between the two similar types of activities. By taking reference to the western experience of "building archeology" and studying the relationship between archaeology and survey and research of standing historic buildings, we hope to record the architectural heritage by the views and attitudes of modern archaeology, and enhance the status of the standing historic buildings recording in the architectural history study and architectural heritage protection. The recording is not only an objective description of architectural heritage, but also need the understanding and awareness of architectural heritage, the analytical recording of standing historic buildings embodies the archaeological feature. The authorities, researchers and engineers concerned should view the survey and research of standing historic buildings as the archaeological activities about standing historic buildings, hence investigate and research them with archaeological perspective and attitude, so as to improve the survey and recording system.更多还原