节点文献

重大工程项目决策中的价值取向及其价值观

Value Orientation and Values of Engineering Decision in Lager Scale Engineering Project

【作者】 高超

【导师】 朱凤青;

【作者基本信息】 哈尔滨工业大学 , 科学技术哲学, 2010, 硕士

【摘要】 长期以来,学界始终关注工程问题,并在工程项目研究方面取得了丰硕的成果。但是在对工程项目决策问题的探究上,只是对工程决策进行多价值分析并加以权衡,缺乏对持有价值的人的价值观的追问。对重大工程项目决策中的价值取向及其价值观进行研究非常必要,应该明确工程决策价值分析中出现的问题源于价值观的根本差异。本文首先通过重大工程项目决策中的价值分析,把握价值取向在价值分析中的作用,进而明确价值取向背后的价值观。由于决策主体不同,因此重大工程项目决策受制于决策主体的价值观。接着对多元化决策主体进行分析,理解决策的最终话语权主体。通过具体实例,认识价值冲突的不可避免性及重大工程项目中决策主体价值取向的多元化。由“牧场悖论”的启示,深入到价值观问题,即要在价值取向上达成一致,关键是价值观的统一。之后阐述了工程决策价值分析应该遵循的三大原则——合规律性与合目的性相统一原则、个体选择与社会选择相统一原则、创价价值与代价价值相统一原则。最后借助“囚徒困境”与博弈思想,分析价值观的统一与价值冲突的化解,讨论重大工程项目决策科学化中的民主与集中,建构重大工程项目决策中的“核心价值观”。

【Abstract】 Over the years, scholars have always concerned about the issues and research in the project has achieved fruitful results. But the decision on the issue of exploration projects, the only multi-value analysis of engineering decisions and to weigh the lack of value people hold the values of questioning. Decision-making on major projects and their values in the value orientation of research is necessary, it should be clear decision-making value engineering analysis of the problems stems from fundamental differences in values.The article begins from the value analysis of engineering decision in lager scale engineering project,and analyzes its characteristics and the role of the basic theory. Because of different Decision-makers,the value analysis of engineering decision Depends on the values of Engineering subject. Secondly it introduces a diversity of engineering decision to comprehend the ultimate voice of the main decision-making. Through concrete examples, recognizing the inevitability of value conflict and the diversity of engineering decision in lager scale engineering project. From "farm paradox" Depth to the values issue, the key is the unity of values to agree on values. Thirdly it points out the value analysis of engineering decision should follow three principles-combined regularity and purpose, combined individual choice and social choice, combined the value created and the value of lost. Finally using the“Prisoners Dilemma”and“Game Theory”, the unity of values and value conflict resolution, discussion of major scientific projects in the democratic decision-making and concentration, decision-making in the construction of major projects“Core Values”.

  • 【分类号】F284
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】233
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络