【作者】 许继影；

【导师】 姚多喜；

【作者基本信息】 安徽理工大学 ， 地质工程， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 煤层底板突水问题成为煤矿开采的一个重大的安全隐患,带压开采已成为深部煤炭资源开发的主要开采方式。与此相适应,底板灰岩水的防治尤为重要。本文针对袁店煤矿101、102采区10煤层开采底板灰岩水防治关键技术进行了多方面研究。首先分析了研究区底板灰岩的水文地质特征,由灰岩的沉积特征、径流特征、抽水试验及水化学分析结果得出：对煤层开采影响的太原组1-四灰含水层处于相对的封闭水文地质单元,循环微弱,富水性弱-中等,灰岩水文地质条件中等-复杂。同时运用了灰色BP神经网络和有限元数值模拟预测了采动影响下底板破坏深度,两种预测结果相近,最大值为14.23m。其次利用分形理论研究了101、102采区10煤底板隔水层完整性,结合研究区内底板的岩性、隔水层厚度、岩层组合情况,得出底板隔水性能较好。利用数值模拟得出,在采动影响下101、102采区分界的F2断层未活化,说明研究区受此断层突水威胁较小,但仍存在受断层切割使10煤层与太灰对接现象,使可能发生突水。通过对研究区地质及水文地质条件,以及岩溶陷落柱形成条件研究,得出研究区不具备形成较大岩溶陷落柱的地质条件。并通过突水系数理论计算结果分析得出,研究区的灰岩含水层水压高、底板隔水层薄,处于承压水上“超限开采”状态,存在灰岩突水的可能性,但根据板模型理论计算结果可知,-500m浅部和深部-700m开采时底板突水的可能性不大。采用了“大井法”、Q-S法对研究区的涌水量进行了预算,得出正常涌水量244.17m3/h,突出涌水量399.27m3/h。最后运用灰色模糊综合评价法对10煤底板突水危险性进行评价,由评价结果可知,研究区内10煤底板突水危险性等级以突水相对安全区和突水威胁区为主,占整个研究区80%。安全区仅分布在101采区的东南,101采区以突水相对安全区为主；102采区以突水威胁区为主,该区是煤矿生产过程中应重点探查与预防区域,根据研究区内水文地质特征并结合评价分析结果,提出了具体的防治水方案,进行了太灰水工程综合勘探设计,为类似下组煤开采提供借鉴经验。图[33]表[31]参[个数]更多还原

【Abstract】 The water-inrush problem from coal floor has become a major security hidden danger of coal mining. Mining has become the main mining way of the deep coal resources development. To adjust to this, the limestone water prevention of coal floor seems to be important. Based on the key technology of limestone water prevention used on the 10 coal seam of Yuandian Mine No.101 and No.102, this paper made a variety of studies. Firstly, hydrogeological character of study areas was analysed. The sedimentary character, runoff character, pumping test and hydrochemical analysed results of limestone showed that water-bearing stratum of Taiyuan No.1～4 rock stayed in a relatively closed hydrogeology units, recycle was lightly weak, and aquifer ability was weak-medium, and the hydrogeological conditions were medium-complicated. Meanwhile, Gray BP artificial neural networks and numerical simulation were used to predict the coal-floor’s destroyed depth under the mining impact. Both of these two predictions showed the close result and the maximum was 14.23m. Secondarily, the 10 coal seam water-resisting layer integrity of Mine No.101 and No.102 was studied by using the Fractal Theory. Then combining with the floor lithology, the water-resisting layer thickness and the rock combinations, it made the conclusion that the floor’s water-resisting ability was relatively good. Obtained by numerical simulation showed that demarcated F2 fault between No.101 and No.102 under the mining influence were not activated, which indicated that water-inrush of fault cased a little threat to the study areas. But there might happen to be the abutment caused by 10 coal seam and Tai limestone coals as to cut by fault, which might happen to water-inrush. According to the study of study areas’geology and hydrogeological conditions and the study of karst collapse column formation conditions, it made the conclusions that there were no geological conditions for the study areas to form the larger karst collapse column. And according to the analyses of water-inrush coefficient theoretical calculation, it found the results that on the study areas’limestone aquifer layer, the water pressure was high, the floor water-resisting layers were thin, and confined water was in a "overrun mining" condition, there was possibility of limestone water-inrush. But according to the calculated results of the plate model theory, it showed that there was a very little possibility of floor water-inrush on -500m shallow side and -700m deep side when mining. By using the "Large Diameter Well Method" and Q-S method to budget the water inflow of study areas, it made conclusions that the normal water inflow was 244.17 m3/h and inrush water inflow water was 399.27 m3/h. Finally, by using grey fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to evaluate the inrush water risk of 10 coal floor, and according to the evaluated results, it showed that water-inrush risk level of 10 coal floor on the study areas were mainly deal with water-inrush relatively safe areas and water-inrush threatened areas, which occupied 80 percents of the whole study area. The safe areas were just distributed in the southeast part of No.101 mining area that were mainly water-inrush relatively safe area; No.102 mining area was mainly water-inrush threatened area that was needed to be explored and prevented importantly during coal mining productive process. According to the hydrogeological conditions of study areas and combining with comprehensive evaluation analytical results together, this paper presented the concrete preventing water scheme and made a comprehensive exploration design of limestone water engineering to provide the experience for mining the next similar coal layer.Figure 33 table 31 reference [amount]更多还原