【作者】 许晓玉；

【导师】 陈一；

【作者基本信息】 哈尔滨师范大学 ， 汉语言文字学， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 以往的汉语歧义研究,比较系统地揭示了词、短语、单句、复句各级单位中存在的多义现象及其原因、类型。然而,紧缩句这一级单位中的多义问题,却一直没有进行专门的研究。本文运用功能语法、认知语法等相关理论,对三种紧缩结构的歧义现象作出分析,并从语义、功能、认知等角度对歧义原因以及理解倾向性等问题作出解释。“不……不……”结构的歧义是由于结构内部包含并列、条件两种语义关系造成的。本文从语言主观性角度观察,在原有并列关系、条件关系分类的基础上,进一步区分出客观并列、客观条件、主观并列、主观条件四个小类,明确歧义仅出现在主观类中,并对对主观类存在的原因作出解释,从“语义相似性的析取”“句法组合可分说”“多出现在批评语中”三个角度分析主观并列的“不……不……”存在的条件。最后,运用原型理论说明主观类“不……不……”的非典型性。“再……也……”结构存在两种歧义:1.顺与逆的歧义。“再……也……”可表逆接假设,也可表顺接假设。首先,我们分别对两种构式进行分析,其次,从语用等级、句尾“了2”的功能、前后项双向对应关系、焦点重音四个方面解释了歧义结构中影响理解倾向波动的诸因素。逆接与顺接的“再……也……”体现不同语用功能,在语用量级选择上存在差异。“再……也……”句尾添加“了2”后只能表达顺接关系,不能表达逆接关系,借鉴行、知、言三域理论的相关成果可对此作出合理解释。“再……也……”的前后项呈单向对应关系时句子为单义,存在双向对应时,句子出现歧义。2.虚与实的歧义。虚与实的歧义存在于逆接“再……也……”内部,主要从结构的外部语境入手对歧义加以描写分化。“一……就……”结构歧义。从“中间项”争议入手区分常规顺接、非常规逆接两类“一……就……”结构,考察前后项词汇义、句类、焦点重音、主观性评注成分对歧义“一……就……”意义的影响。陈述、断言性的“一……就……”一般与常规一致,体现常规顺接关系,疑问则分两种情况。在陈述内部,常规顺接关系体现自然重音,而非常规逆接关系体现对比重音,重音在前在后决定于说话人突出条件的特异性还是结果的特异性。主观评注性成分对“一……就……”结构的语义关系有显化作用。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the past study of ambiguity in Chinese, some phenomenon and causes of ambiguous words that exist in words, phrases, single sentences, complex sentences are listed out. However, no special study is given to ambiguous words in shortened sentences, or such study is neglected. In this article the theory of functional grammar and cognition grammar is applied to the analysis on three shortened structures for their ambiguity. And some causes of ambiguity and comprehension tendency are explained from different aspects of semantics, function and cognition.The ambiguity in“bu…bu…”comes from its interior structure containing two compound, conditional semantics. From language subjective point, this structure is further classified into four aspects: objective compound, objective condition, subjective compound and subjective condition on their original compound and conditional compound. And it is clearly pointed out that ambiguity appears only in subjective patterns. The author here explains by introducing language subjective theory why subjective causes come in three aspects of“Comprehension of Similarity in Semantics”,“Separated Syntactic Combination”and“Often in Critical Comments”, and gives an account of the conditions where“bu…bu…”exists. Finally, prototype theory helps us understand the non-typical nature of the subjective kind.“zai…ye…”structure has two ambiguous meanings. 1) the ambiguity of“go along or go against”. In“zai…ye…”structure, their appear two structured isomerism, respectively referring to along-supposition and against-supposition. Firstly, the author gives analysis separately on these two structures. And secondly some causes are illustrated to affect the understanding of ambiguity within language hierarchy, the function of ending“le2”, the corresponding relations between the fore part to post part, and focus stress. Against-structure and along-structure of“zai…ye…”function differently in language use, therefore there exist differences for the choices of language hierarchy. The ambiguity of“zai…ye…”with ending“le2”only gives along-sense instead of against-sense. Thus explanation is made after the theory of three conceptual domains. When the part before or after“zai…ye…”with one way corresponding relationship, the sentence has one meaning. When the part with two-way corresponding relationship, the sentence has ambiguity. 2) The ambiguity of subjunctive and active, which lies in the“against–structure”“zai…ye…”, is mainly described and classified from its external language environment.The ambiguity of“yi…jiu…”structure, which leads us to classify from its“middle item”into normal along-structure and subnormal against-structure, may be differentiated from the meanings of the vocabulary, kinds of sentences, focus stress, subjective comments of the fore part or the post part to the affection of their ambiguity. Declarative, assertive structure of“yi…jiu…”is generally consistent with normal along-relationships; Questions have two kinds. In declarative sentence, normal along-structure relationship presents natural stress, while subnormal against-structure presents comparative stress. Whether or not the stress comes on the fore part or the latter part lies in the conditional specificity and resultant specificity given by the speaker. Obviously subjective comments provide more functions to semantic relations of“yi…jiu…”structure.更多还原