【作者】 高怀；

【导师】 李昌盛；

【作者基本信息】 西南政法大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 主诉检察官办案责任制是由最高人民检察院在全国检察机关审查起诉部门推行的一项检察改革措施,该制度的实质是对公诉权的重新配置,目的是在审查起诉部门建立一种责任明确、高效廉洁、符合诉讼规律的工作机制。主诉检察官办案责任制推行十年以来,取得了不错的成绩,但仍然存在不少问题,使得该项改革举措难以进一步向纵深发展。本文的目的在于通过对主诉检察官办案责任制的现状进行分析,对其实际运行效果进行考察和评析,找出阻碍该项改革发展的深层原因,并在此基础上,回答“是否有必要继续推进和深化主诉检察官办案责任制改革”的问题。本文共分为五个部分,共约30000字。具体内容如下:本文的第一部分是引言,主要介绍本文的研究目的、研究方法、研究背景以及研究问题。本文的第一章首先探讨了主诉检察官办案责任制的性质应当是检察机关内部的工作机制;其次介绍了主诉检察官办案责任制的产生背景和实施概况,同时指出主诉检察官办案责任制改革在现阶段面临着进退两难的困境。本文的第二章主要研究建立主诉检察官办案责任制所应包含的基本内容,主要包括办案模式的选择、主诉检察官的选任、主诉检察官的职权范围、主诉检察官与其他主体的关系、保障机制以及监督机制六个方面。本文的第三章分为两个部分。第一部分是对C市J区人民检察院实行主诉检察官办案责任制基本情况的实践考察,具体内容有:(1)在办案模式上采用搭档模式,但助手也需要承办案件;(2)主诉检察官选任程序逐渐流于形式;(3)大部分主诉检察官认为其职权范围过窄;(4)主诉检察官与助手、主诉检察官会议的关系未理顺;(5)对主诉检察官的保障和监督。第二部分首先总结了C市J区人民检察院实行主诉检察官办案责任制的成效,其中最主要的是提高办案质量和培养优秀公诉人;其次指出C市J区人民检察院实行主诉检察官办案责任制存在的问题,包括主诉检察官职权范围过小、主诉检察官会议功能异化、缺乏有效的保障机制等。本文的第四章分为三个部分。第一部分是对我国检察机关在全国推行主诉检察官办案责任制的主要成绩进行总结,主要包括:(1)强化公诉权的司法属性;(2)提高诉讼效率;(3)明确权力与责任;(4)培养公诉人才。第二部分提出我国检察机关在推行主诉检察官办案责任制的过程中存在的问题,主要包括:(1)缺乏立法支持;(2)权、责、利不统一;(3)配套机制不完善;(4)主诉检察官流失现象严重。第三部分结合主诉检察官办案责任制的施行现状,探讨该制度继续深化发展的条件和前景,从而得出我国检察机关在目前的条件和形势下不适宜继续推进和深化主诉检察官办案责任制改革的结论。更多还原

【Abstract】 The chief prosecutor system is a prosecutorial reform measures which is implemented in the nation’s public prosecution departments by the Supreme People’s Procuratorate. The system is to reconfigure the public prosecution authorities in essence, to establish a working mechanism with clearly-defined responsibilities, efficiency, probity, fair procedures. The chief prosecutor system has been implementing for ten years, althrough there are many achievements, there are still many problems, making it difficult to further the reform measures in depth. The purpose of this article is to analyze the status of the chief prosecutor system, to investigate and assess the system’s actual effect, to answer the question“Is it need to continue promoting the reform of the chief prosecutor system”.This article is divided into five parts, consists of about 30000 words. Details are as follows:The first part of this paper is the introduction of the purpose of this study, research methods, background and research questions.Chapter I of this article gives the genernal introduction of the chief prosecutor system, including the nature, the background and the general situation of this system. At the same time, point out the chief prosecutor system is facing the delimma at this stage.Chapter II of this article is to research on the basic elements of the chief prosecutor system, including the following six areas: (1) The choice of model. (2) The appointment of chief prosecutor. (3) Scope of chief prosecutor’s functions and powers. (4) The relationship between chief prosecutors and other subjects. (5) Protection mechanism.(6) Supervision mechanism.Chapter III of this article is divided into two parts. The first part is the practical investigation of the implementation of the chief prosecutor system in C Municipality J District People’s Procuratorate, including: (1) partner mode adopted, but assistant also need to undertake the case; (2) chief prosecutor selection process gradually becomes a mere formality; (3) most of the chief prosecutors consider that the functions and powers of chief prosecutor is narrow; (4) The relationship between chief prosecutor and his assistant, chief prosecutor and the chief prosecutor conferencing did not straighten out; (5) the protetion and the supervision of chief prosecutor. The second part firstly to summarize the effectiveness of the implement of the chief prosecutor system in C Municipality J District People’s Procuratorate, of which the most important effectiveness is to improve the quality of case handling and to train excellent public prosecutors; then point out the problems of the implement of the chief prosecutor system in C Municipality J District People’s Procuratorate, including the scope of chief prosecutor’s functions and powers is too small, alienation of chief prosecutor conferencing, lack of effective protection mechanism.Chapter IV of this paper is divided into three parts. The first part is the summary of the main success which the chief prosecutor system achieves, including: (1) Strengthen the judicial attribute of public prosecution authorities; (2) Improve the efficiency of the proceedings; (3) Define authorities and responsibilities; (4) Cultivate public prosecution personnel. The second part presents the problems of the chief prosecutor system, including: (1) Lack of legislative support; (2) Powers, responsibilities and benefits are not uniform; (3) Supporting mechanisms are inadequate; (4) Chief prosecutors loss is serious. The third part researches the conditions and prospects if the chief prosecutor system could continue to develop in the present circumstances, to arrive at the conclusion that it’s inappropriate to continue to promote the reform of the chief prosecutor system in the present conditions and circumstances.更多还原