论刑事诉讼中的程序性制裁

【作者】 王磊磊；

【导师】 宋振武；

【作者基本信息】 烟台大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 随着我国对人权保护的日益关注,我国的法律也在不断地健全和完善。但是在刑事诉讼实务中,公安机关超期羁押、非法取证,甚至是将以刑讯逼供的方式获取的言词证据作为定案的依据、法官违反回避制度、违反公开审判规定等情况长期存在。对此,我国一直以来多采用实体性制裁方式来制约程序性违法行为,但效果甚微。其根本原因在于我国这方面的法律制度还不完善,缺乏具体的可操作的制度,没有立足于我国的国情之上,确立规制程序性违法行为的程序性制裁制度。我国现行立法虽存在程序性制裁的相关设计,但缺乏系统的程序性制裁设置。例如,我国虽确立了撤销原判发回重审制度,但无论是立法机构的立法原意说明,还是最高法院的司法解释,都没有对这一程序性制裁措施作出任何具体的解释,司法实践中对其适用也是极为罕见的,由此导致我国刑事程序性制裁制度上的空白。要填补我国刑事程序性制裁制度上的空白,从根本上解决程序性违法行为,需要仔细分析我国现存的法律规定,根据我国自身的特点,借鉴西方国家的程序设计,制定出有中国特色的刑事程序性制裁措施。本文从程序性违法的性质、原因着手揭示程序性违法是一种独立于实体性违法的违法形态;对程序性制裁的性质,法理依据和局限性进行梳理,揭示程序性制裁是一种独立于实体性制裁的法律后果;对我国程序性制裁的现状进行分析,揭示我国程序性制裁的缺陷;最后,在对中外程序性制裁作比较研究的基础上,结合本国国情,从完善已有制度、创建新制度、搭配相关配套制度三个方面完善我国的程序性制裁制度。更多还原

【Abstract】 With China’s increasing concern for human rights protection,China’s laws are constantly improving and perfecting too. But the practice in criminal proceedings,various illegal conditions exist for a long.For example,the public security organs of extended detention, illegal evidence, and even obtaining oral evidences by which the way will be torture to as a basis for decision,Judge violation avoidance system,violation of the provisions of a public trial and so on.In this regard, China has always been to use more substantive sanction way to restrain procedural violations, but the effect is minimal.The underlying reason is China’s legal system is not perfect in this area, the lack of specific operational system.based on the situation of our country is not above the established regulatory procedures for violations of procedural sanctions regime.Not based on the China’s national conditions, establish procedural sanctions regime for governning the procedural violations .Although the existence of current legislation related to the design of procedural sanctions, but the lack of systematic procedures of the sanctions set.For example,although established the cassation of the remand system, but neither the description of the legislative intent of the legislature or the Supreme Court’s judicial interpretation, are not any specific interpretation on the procedural sanctions.Their application in judicial practice is also very rare, which led to the sanctions of the criminal procedural system of the blank.To fill the gaps of the criminal Procedure sanctions system, and to solve a the procedural violations fundamentally, requires careful analysis of the existing law, according to China’s own characteristics, from Western countries, program design, to develop a criminal with Chinese characteristics Procedural sanctions.Via the nature and reasons of procedural illegal, reveals that procedural illegal is an entity independent of the illegal form of substantive illegal.On the procedural nature of the sanctions, the legal basis for and limitations to sort out, revealing procedural sanctions is a separate entity sanctions of the legal consequences.On the procedural sanctions’ status of the analysis, reveals the shortcomings of the procedural sanctions.Finally, in the comparison of Chinese and foreign procedural sanctions based on the research, combined with our national conditions, from the improve the existing system, create a new system, with a supporting system for the Improvement of procedural sanctions regime.更多还原