民事检察监督促进和解问题探析

【作者】 邵怡；

【导师】 段厚省；

【作者基本信息】 复旦大学 ， 法律， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 我国社会目前正处转型期,各种社会矛盾集中爆发,司法机关办案和维稳压力加剧,各地检察机关从构建社会主义和谐社会理念出发,积极开展“检调对接”等检察监督促进和解工作,为民事检察职能更多注入了促进和解的内容。而我国现有法律关于民事检察监督的制度设计是以抗诉为主要内容的,对于不符合抗诉条件的民事申诉案件检察机关应否开展促进和解、如何开展促进和解,法律并无明确规定,给实践操作带来种种困惑。为准确把握检察机关在促进和解中的价值和定位,不断优化民事检察监督职能,笔者结合理论与实践,试从以下几个部分对民事检察监督促进和解相关问题作一番探析,以期对民事检察监督促进和解的实践发展提供些许参考。一、民事检察监督促进和解的实践发展；二、民事检察监督促进和解的合理定位和内在价值；三、民事检察监督促进和解概述；四、民事检察监督促进和解之必要性和可行性论证；五、民事检察监督促进和解的适用范围、原则和条件；六、民事检察监督促进和解中和解协议的法律效力；七、结语；八、余论。更多还原

【Abstract】 Our society is undergoing a transformation, with sorts of outbreaks of various social problems. Increased handling and stability maintenance pressure the judiciary. From the ideas of building a socialist harmonious society, prosecution actively supervise the work of reconciliation in order to give more content to the crown functions. The design of the system of prosecutorial supervision of China’s existing laws is to protest as the main content. As to the cases which do not meet the conditions for civil appeals protest, whether the prosecution should be carried out to promote reconciliation and how, law does not clearly defined, which brought to the practical operation puzzle. In order to accurately grasp the value and location of reconciliation, oversight functions to optimize the Crown functions, the author combines theory and practice, try to do an analysis of relevant issues from the following sections:1. The practice of reconciliation.2. Reasonable position and intrinsic value.3. Overview.4. The necessity and feasibility.5. Scope.6. The legal effect of the settlement agreement.7. Conclusion.8.Others.更多还原