【作者】 陈福；

【导师】 白洁；

【作者基本信息】 新疆大学 ， 法律， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 随着我国改革开放的推进和经济的高速发展以及入世的进展,人们的创新和维权意识越来越强,于是向国家知识产权局专利局提出专利申请的案件也急剧上涨,为了完善专利制度并与国际接轨,加快专利审查的进程,便于当事人提起专利诉讼,我国在2008年对《专利法》进行了修改。但是修改后的《专利法》还存在一定的缺陷,有关专利诉讼的缺陷尤其明显。目前有关专利诉讼研究方面的论文主要是涉及等同原则、禁止反悔原则等与专利侵权诉讼相关的问题,而对其它专利诉讼问题研究的文章很少。本文主要是从律师和专利代理人双重角度出发对专利诉讼进行深刻分析,并且介绍美国、德国、日本和英国比较具有其特色的专利诉讼制度,进而指出我国专利诉讼制度中存在的等同原则问题、禁止反悔原则问题、间接侵权问题、平行进口问题、不侵权之诉问题等等,进而针对这些问题提出一些意见和建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 With breathless economic expansion and the advance of reform and opening up, and the access to WTO, the number of patent applications and patent litigation is increasing for the people’s growing awareness of innovation and rights. Although the Patent Law of the People’s Republic of China has been amended for the third time in 2008 and some new systems have been introduced to it, there are still some defects in the patent system, especially in the patent lawsuit.At present the research papers on the patent litigation are about the principle of equivalence and the principle of file wrapper estoppel, which are the problems about the patent infringement litigation, however, there are scarce papers on other problem of patent litigation. Through comprehensively analyzing patent litigation from the point of view of patent lawyer and introducing the patent litigation systems of USA, Germany ,Japan and United Kingdom whose patent litigation system is relatively perfect, this article points out the defects in patent litigation system of China, then discusses some of essential contributions and proposes advisable solutions.更多还原