上海与美国加州中学艺术课程标准比较研究

【作者】 孟娟娟；

【导师】 夏惠贤；

【作者基本信息】 上海师范大学 ， 课程与教学论， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 艺术教育对于提高学生的艺术素养和综合素质具有重要的作用。美国加州和中国上海于2004年先后颁布了中学艺术课程标准。本文以2004年《上海市中学艺术课程标准》(征求意见稿)和《加州视觉与表演艺术课程标准》(中学部分)为比较研究对象,对两地艺术课程标准中的指导原则、基本结构、目的、内容与要求、实施等方面进行了比较研究,着重论述了以下三个问题:两地课程标准的异同点;两地中学艺术课程标准的差距及其发展方向;加州视觉与表演艺术课程标准对修订上海艺术课程标准的借鉴意义。论文共分五章。第一章是绪论部分,主要介绍论文的选题背景、目的和意义、研究的对象和内容、相关概念界定和研究方法。第二章为相关文献综述,主要对我国和美国的艺术教育及艺术课程标准的相关文献进行了述评,为论文的整个设计奠定基础。第三章对加州中学艺术课程标准的文本进行了分析,主要从基本结构、指导原则、主要内容、设计,实施和评估、主要特点等方面介绍和分析了加州中学艺术课程标准的内涵及其本质。第四章围绕“基本结构”、“基本理念”、“目标和内容”、“实施建议”等方面对上海与加州中学艺术课程标准开展比较、分析和研究。第五章为结论和建议,论文在得出两地标准在“基本理念”、“基本结构”、“目标和内容”、“实施建议”等方面异同点的基础上,得出了加州艺术课程标准对于修订上海艺术课程标准的建议:一是综合艺术课程对现有艺术师资的挑战,建议应通过多种手段提高教师的整体素质,以适应综合艺术课程的需求;二是良好的课堂教学效果对真正实现艺术课程的目标和价值起着关键性的作用,建议艺术教师应具备与综合艺术课程相适应的教学能力;三是关于综合艺术课程的实施操作有困惑,建议加大力度开发和建设艺术课程资源;四是艺术课程的综合性质对艺术教学评价的考验,建议加强综合艺术课程的教学评价。更多还原

【Abstract】 Art Education plays an important role for improving students’literacy and overall quality of art. California of United States and shanghai of China promulgated Secondary schools arts curriculum standards in 2004. This paper has two comparative research objects which are 2004 Shanghai Secondary schools arts curriculum standards (draft for asking for opinion) and Visual and Performing Arts Framework for California Public Schools (Middle Schools Part),it mainly bases above three topics to compare, analyze and study guiding principles, basic structure, purpose, content and requirements, implement principle and other problems of the texts of the two arts curriculum standards, and the three topics focuses on the following questions: What are differences and similarities between two arts curriculum standards; Where is the margin between the two secondary schools arts curriculum standards, and whether do they develop towards the same direction; What can be drawn lessons from Visual and Performing Arts Framework for California Public Schools for revising the arts curriculum standards of Shanghai?The thesis consists of five chapters. Chapter I is the introduction, it mainly talks about the background, purpose and meaning, the content and the object of study, defining the concepts and methods. Chapter II is review of relevant literature, mainly reviews relevant literature about the arts education and arts curriculum standards in China and the U.S. which laid the foundation for the paper’s entire design. Chapter III analyzes the text of Visual and Performing Arts Framework for California Public Schools, it introduces and analyzes the content and nature of California Secondary schools Art Curriculum Standards from the basic structure, guiding principles, main content, design, implementation and evaluation, the main features, etc. Chapter IV compares, analyzes and researches several aspects around the“basic structure”,“basic idea”,“objectives and content”,“implementation of proposed”,etc. of two areas’secondary schools Arts Curriculum standards. Chapter V is conclusions and recommendations, this part mainly obtains proposed amendments based on the conclusions that two standards in the“basic idea”,“basic structure”,“objectives and content”and“implementation of the recommendations”have similarities and differences: Firstly, the comprehensive arts curriculum challenges the existing art teacher, recommended to improve the overall quality of teachers through various means to meet the needs of an integrated arts curriculum; Secondly, good teaching effectiveness play a key role for achieving the objectives and values of art courses, the suggestion is that art teachers should have an teaching ability which adjust to integrated arts curriculum; Thirdly, the implementation of an integrated arts curriculum on the operation are confused, the suggestion is that we should increase the intensity of development and construction of arts curriculum resources; Fourth, the integrated nature of art course challenge teaching evaluation, we propose enhance teaching evaluation of integrated arts curriculum.更多还原