【作者】 刘伟；

【导师】 赵宾福；

【作者基本信息】 吉林大学 ， 考古及博物馆学， 2011， 硕士

【摘要】 器表施压印或刻划之字纹的陶器,是东北地区新石器时代早期考古学文化中比较具有代表性的器物。而辽东半岛含之字纹陶器遗存的时空范畴和文化内涵尚存在着一定的模糊性,因此加强对该地区含之字纹陶器遗存的研究,不仅有助于了解不同地区间的文化关系,也为探讨本地区考古学文化的编年、谱系等相关问题奠定了基础。论文总共分五个部分。第一部分,序言。介绍本文的研究目的及其研究意义。第二部分,发现与认识。介绍辽东半岛含之字纹陶器遗存的发现过程及其认识。第三部分,命名与内涵。对辽东半岛含之字纹陶器的新石器遗存进行重新梳理与分析,认为该地区含之字纹陶器遗存应同属于小珠山下层文化,并且明确其文化内涵。第四部分,分期与年代。对属于小珠山下层文化的北吴屯下层、小珠山下层、后洼下层、大岗等遗存进行了详细的分段研究。根据与周边考古学文化遗存的比较,进一步将小珠山下层文化分为三期,早期可早到兴隆洼文化的晚期阶段,年代当不晚于公元前5000年；中期相当于赵宝沟文化,年代约为公元前5000-4500年；晚期相当于红山文化早期,年代约为公元前4500-4000年。第五部分,分布与类型。介绍小珠山下层文化的分布范围,并认为辽东半岛含之字纹陶器遗存的区别反映的是同一文化内部不同地方类型的差异,即南部的“小珠山下层类型”与北部的“后洼下层类型”的差异。更多还原

【Abstract】 Pressure printing or characterizations of "zhi " word pattern pottery is the representative utensil of early Neolithic archaeological culture in Northeast area. And Spatial-temporal areas and cultural connotations of containing "zhi" word pattern pottery remains in Liaodong Peninsula is still a certain degree of vagueness of category. Strengthen the study of containing "zhi" word pattern pottery remains in the region, is not only helpful to understand the cultural relations between the different areas, to explore the archaeological culture in the region also lay the foundation for chronicle, pedigree and other related issues.This thesis is divided into five parts.The first part is the preface.it describes the purpose of this article and its research significance.The second part is the discovery and understanding. It Introduces the discovery process and the understanding process of containing "zhi" word pattern pottery remains in Liaodong Peninsula.The third part is the naming and connotation. This article points out that the remains containing "zhi" word pattern pottery in Liaodong Peninsula should belong to the same lower Xiao Zhushan culture through re-carding and analyzing of the Neolithic remains in that region and identifies its cultural connotation.The fourth part is the period division and chronology. The remains of lower Beiwutun, lower Xiao Zhushan, lower Houwa, Dagang which are belong to the lower Xiao Zhushan culture are carried out a detailed study on segmentation. According to comparison with the surrounding archaeology cultural relics, the lower Xiao Zhushan culture is divided into three stages. Early stage is equivalent to late stage of Xinglongwa culture, which is no later than 5000 BC. Middle stage is equivalent to Zhaobaogou culture, dating from about 5000 to 4500 BC. And late stage is equivalent to the early stage of Hongshan Culture, dating from about 4500 to 4000 BC.The Fifth part is the distribution and type. It introduces the distribution range of lower Xiao Zhushan culture. The difference reflects the discrepancy among places within the same culture, namely, the southern part of "the lower Xiao Zhushan type" and the northern part of "the lower Houwa type".更多还原