【作者】 鄢凯；

【导师】 熊永明；

【作者基本信息】 南昌大学 ， 法律， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 利用影响力受贿问题学界已经做了比较多的探讨和研究,而利用影响力受贿罪则是2009年才出台的一个新罪。在《刑法修正案(七)》颁布前,学界对利用影响力受贿问题的探讨多是以《联合国反腐败公约》第18条为基础而展开的。现如今,利用影响力受贿罪的出台,以及该罪与《联合国反腐败公约》的差异,引起了学界,甚至是民众的广泛研究和讨论。从总体上分析,这些探讨大致都是从司法认定和立法得失及完善两方面展开的。具体说来,在利用影响力受贿罪主体界定方面,必须明确“近亲属”、“离职的国家工作人员”、“其他有密切关系的人”的范围,以及对它们进行界定的意义。在利用影响力受贿罪的客观方面的认定上,必须明确“影响力”的含义、类型,以及在本罪中的地位,利用“影响力”的具体方式,以及对利用影响力受贿罪的共犯形态、犯罪停止形态的区分。在利用影响力受贿罪与相关犯罪的界定方面,必须明确利用影响力受贿罪与斡旋受贿罪,利用影响力受贿罪与介绍贿赂罪,利用影响力受贿罪与诈骗罪在犯罪构成上的异同,以及司法认定上的难点。在利用影响力受贿罪的立法得失及完善方面,利用影响力受贿罪存在五个方面的得失,包括扩大了受贿犯罪的主体范围,却增加了受贿犯罪主体范围的不确定性；客观方面的表述仍没有脱离既有受贿犯罪的立法缺陷；在刑罚裁量上突破了受贿犯罪既有模式,但具体标准有待明确；是与《联合国反腐败公约》的对接,但对接不完全；缺乏对行贿行为的规制,造成贿赂行为规制上的失衡。更多还原

【Abstract】 Scholars have done a lot discussion and research on bribery by influential, and using the influence of taking bribes is a new crime after the introduction in 2009 in the "Criminal Law Amendment (7)". Before the "Criminal Law Amendment (7)", the promulgation of the academic impact of the use of bribery is based on Article 18 of "United Nations Convention against Corruption". Today, there is a difference between the introduction of accepting bribes by using influence and the "United Nations Convention against Corruption." The difference has caused the academia, or even people’s extensive research and discussion. From the overall analysis, these discussions are generally focused on recognizing of the Justice, and both gains and losses on legislation. Specifically, when it comes to the main subject of this crime, we must make clear "near relative", "left the national staff", "other closely related person" of the scope and define their meaning. As for the objective aspect of identification, you must explicitly "influence" means, type, and the status of this crime, the use of "influence" of the specific approach and influence on the use of accomplice in the crime of bribery form, the distinction between forms of crime to stop. Among influence in the use of bribery and related offenses defined, there should be a clear influence of accepting bribes and using the good offices of taking bribes, taking bribes and the use of influence introduced bribery, the use of bribery and influence in the crime constitutes a fraud on the similarities and differences and difficulties on the judicial determination. Influence of bribes in the use of gains and losses and improve the legislation, the use of influence in accepting bribes results in gains and losses in five areas, including expanding the scope of the main crime of bribery, while increased the scope of uncertainty of briber; the presentation of the objective aspect is still not out of the existing defects in the legislation; breakthrough in the penalty on the crime of bribery is the progressive point, but the specific criteria should be more clear; the sentence to this new crime is the adjustment to the "United Nations Convention against Corruption," but the adjustment is not complete; lack punishment of giving bribery caused the imbalance of regulation.更多还原