节点文献
大学场域中师生话语权研究
Research on the Right to Speak of University Teachers and Students in the Field of University
【作者】 林健生；
【导师】 朱家存；
【作者基本信息】 安徽师范大学 ， 教育学原理， 2010， 硕士
【副题名】以一所大学为例
【摘要】 在大学场域的话语权构成中,师生话语权是最基本同时也是最重要的组成部分。但现实中的师生话语权却不尽人意,在学校场域中师生话语权时时遭到限制甚至剥夺。笔者以一个局外者的身份去观察大学校园发生的一切,去倾听学生对学校的一些言论。在对自己所见所闻进行反思的基础上,分析导致这些现象或言论出现的原因。大学师生在学校权力场域中其实是处于话语权缺失的状态。这种缺失导致师生在遇到问题时往往会采取一些过激的方法和手段,体现为对场域中高位群体话语权的消极对抗和“自我放逐”。同时,笔者又以一个教师(局内者)的身份走入课堂教学中,探寻师生在课堂教学中的不同角色分担如何导致了各自所代表的利益群体和话语群体之间的冲突和矛盾,最终发现课堂教学过程中的师生话语权之间的交锋其实受到课堂外师生在学校场域中话语权缺失的影响。接着从大学精神、学校管理制度的本质、教师和学生三个角度来分析造成师生话语权缺失的原因。最后提出解决的策略思考:用宽容、自由和公平这三个原则来分析师生话语权归来的条件、过程和结果。
【Abstract】 Right to speak of teachers and students is the most basic and the most important component at the university field. But the reality isn’t as we wish, right to speak of teachers and students in the school field has often been limited or even denied.As an outsider, the author observe everything happen in the university campus, and hear some comments made by students in the school. On the basis of reflection and analysis of all that I saw and heard, I analyze the causes of such phenomena or speech. Teachers and students are in the "speechless" state in the Field of power, that is missing the right to speak. This deletion make teachers and students often take some radical ways and means when facing problems, displaying negative resistance and "self-imposed exile" to the high level group’s right to speak.At the same time, the author enter into the classroom as a teacher, who is a player, to explore how the different roles the teachers and students undertaking in the classroom has led to the conflict and contradiction between groups which represent the interests of their respective groups. We found ultimately that confrontations between the teachers and students in the classroom are affected by that outside of the classroom. Then we analyze the causes of speechless of teachers and students in three angles: from the university’s spirit, the nature of school management system, and the teachers and students. Last, we propose solutions to the strategic thinking: analyzing the conditions, the process and the results for the returning of the right to speak of students and teachers, with these three principles of tolerance, freedom and fairness.