试论网络传媒下的刑事审判公开

【作者】 沈红芳；

【导师】 王戬；

【作者基本信息】 华东政法大学 ， 诉讼法学， 2010， 硕士

【摘要】 当今时代,通过网络传播的刑事审判案件日益多见,这些案件通过网络的传播,在社会上产生了重大影响,有些还直接影响到了刑事审判机关的刑事判决结果。粗略思考网络传播对刑事审判案件的影响因素,不难发现,至少有以下四点:第一,“依法治国”的确立;第二,法学教育的急速扩张和法制意识的普遍提高;第三,网络的迅猛发展与日益普及;第四,刑事审判公开的原则确立与制度设计。网络传媒的迅速发展和日益普及,大大加速了法学教育以及“普法”活动的开展。广大普通网民对于社会上发生的一些的刑事审判案件,给予高度地关注,并通过自己的“转帖”、“跟帖”等“点击、复制”传播行动,反过来大大促进了刑事审判案件网络传播。审判机关“审时度势”、“与时俱进”,积极地将刑事审判公开内容上传网络,拓展了刑事审判公开的渠道。但是,郁于现实的种种情况,审判机关在诸多方面,还难以跨越刑事审判网络公开的障碍。“安排旁听”、“排斥旁听”、“糊涂判决”还时常出现。在具备客观条件的条件下,社会期待着审判机关借助网络,在审判公开方面实现新的突破。刑事审判的网络公开,产生了积极的正面社会效果,一定程度上实现了审判公开的设计初衷。同时,刑事审判在网络的公开中,也带来了难以克服的负面社会效应。在此方面,如何“扬长避短”成为刑事审判网络公开必须面对的重大课题。面对稍显纷乱的网络公开中的刑事审判,本文提出应当厘清刑事审判公开与网络传媒之间的关系,通过积极立法的形式,合理规范网络传媒和普通网民的行为,界定权利,明确义务。在“有法可依”的情况下,执法机关就可在保障言论自由的同时,严厉打击网络中的不负责任行为。在历史进化至网络时代的背景下,刑事审判机关应解放思想、大胆创新,自信面对刑事审判的网络公开,积极地通过网络查觉被告人的行为所造成的“社会影响”,同时,又不致于为网络舆论所左右。当然,真正有效地实现刑事审判的网络公开,还需网络传媒和每位普通网民大力提高自己的法律和道德素养,还网络一片文明、纯洁的天地。更多还原

【Abstract】 Nowdays, through the case of criminal trial network spread increasingly , greatly influenced in society, There are also a direct impact on the criminal justice authorities of criminal judgments.Rough on network communication on the impact of criminal trials, it is not difficult to find, at least the following four points: First, the "law" set;Second, the law of education and the legal consciousness of rapid expansion of universal; Third, the rapid development of the network and increasing popularity; fourth, the principle of openness in criminal trials established and system design.The rapid development of network media and increasing popularity, to greatly speed up the legal education as well as the "legal". The majority of ordinary Internet users for community happens on some cases, criminal trials give high attention , and through their own "posted" and "threads" and "click, copy propagation," which in turn greatly facilitated the dissemination of criminal trials network.Judicial organs "judging" and "time", actively criminal trials open content upload network, has developed the open channel criminal trial. However, due to the reality situation, the judicial organs in many aspects, it is difficult to cross a criminal trial network public obstacles. "The arrangement of audit," "rejection audit", "is often confused judgment". With the objective conditions on the condition, social expecting judicial organs in the trial by network, achieved a new breakthrough in public.The criminal trial network publicly, produced the positive effect of positive society to a certain extent, realize the judgment of the original design of public. At the same time, the criminal trial in the public network, also brought to overcome the negative social effect. In this aspect, how to become a criminal trial frequently-employed ", "network public must face the important topic.Facing slightly tumultuous network in the public, this paper presents a criminal trial shall clarify the criminal trial and the relationship between network media, Through active legislation form, reasonable standard network media and ordinary users of behavior, defines rights, obligations. In the circumstances, departmentalism "law enforcement will be in free speech security crackdown on Internet, the irresponsible behavior. In the historical evolution and network era, under the background of the criminal judicial organs should emancipate the mind, bold innovation, self-confident face criminal trial network publicly, actively through a network of the defendant’s act caused by social influence ", and ", and not for the public network. Of course, the real effective realization of the public for the criminal trial network, network media and each ordinary Internet users to improve their legal and moral qualities, but also network a civilization, pure heaven.更多还原