【摘要】 目的比较在芦山和汶川地震伤员救治中四川大学华西医院两种不同急诊接诊、分诊流程对大规模地震伤员急诊滞留时间的影响。方法回顾性分析芦山地震后12小时内华西医院急诊科收治的65例伤员的诊治信息及在急诊科滞留时间,与汶川地震时批量伤员急诊滞留时间相对比,分析两种院内急诊接诊、分诊流程对大规模地震伤员急诊滞留时间的影响。结果芦山地震伤员按接诊、分诊流程在急诊滞留时间中位数为0.51 h,而汶川伤员在急诊滞留时间中位数为2.13 h,两者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论芦山接诊、分诊流程是对汶川地震时的接诊、分诊流程的经验总结和改进,可作为类似灾后批量伤员院内急诊接诊、分诊的参考。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To explore the influence of two emergency reception and triages workflows between Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes on the victim’s length of stay in emergency department of the West China Hospital of Sichuan University.MethodsA total of 65 victims admitted in the West China Hospital within 12 hours after Lushan earthquake were retrospectively analyzed,and their diagnosis and treatment information and the length of stay in emergency department were collected and compared with those of the victims in Wenchuan earthquake.Then we analyzed the influence of two emergency reception and triage workflows on the length of stay of the batches of earthquake victims.ResultsFor the Lushan earthquake victims,the median length of stay in the emergency reception and triage workflow was 0.51 hour,while that was 2.13 hours for the Wenchuan earthquake victims,with a significant difference(P<0.05).ConclusionThe emergency reception and triage workflow for Lushan earthquake victims is a summarized experience and improvement based on that for Wenchuan earthquake,which can be used as references for treating batches of victims in the emergency department after a disaster.更多还原