【摘要】 生态环境损害索赔制度和生态环境行政问责制度是我国生态文明建设的一体两面,但是政府行政机关在选择索赔时存在两难困境,其中原因可以归结为生态环境行政问责具有基层效应、波及效应和严厉效应等三大特征。在暂时不能解决生态环境行政问责基层效应的前提下,应当采取依法问责化解波及效应、适度问责缓和严厉效应、完善问责推动积极索赔等措施,以应对波及效应和严厉效应,突破两难困境和健全问责机制。更多还原

【Abstract】 The claim system and the administrative accountability system, both for the compensation for ecological damage, are two sides of the construction of ecological civilization in China. However, there are dilemmas in the choice of claims by the governments, which can be attributed to three characteristics of the administrative accountability system, the grass-roots effect, the ripple effect and the severe effect.Meanwhile, under the premise of not being able to solve the grass-roots effect, how to deal with the ripple effect and the severe effect is the main problem of breaking through the dilemma and improving the accountability mechanism. Specifically, measures should be taken as, resolving the ripple effect by accountability according to the law, alleviating the severe effect in a moderate way of accountability, and improving accountability system to benefit the claim system.更多还原