节点文献

砂土的动态空间滑动面及其强度准则适应性研究

Several Dynamic Spatially Mobilized Planes of Sandy Soil and Research on Strength Criterion Adaptability

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 陈昌禄邵生俊王桃桃

【Author】 CHEN Chang-lu;SHAO Sheng-jun;WANG Tao-tao;School of Civil Engineering and Architecture,Guizhou University of Engineering Science;Institute of Geotechnical Engineering,Xi’an University of Technology;

【机构】 毕节学院土木建筑工程学院西安理工大学岩土工程研究所

【摘要】 在砂土真三轴试验的基础上根据传统强度准则建立空间滑动面的原理,提出了多种动态空间滑动面并建立相应的强度准则;对比分析传统强度理论和新建立的强度准则与真三轴砂土试验资料之间的差异和优劣,定量指出各个准则的强度误差。结果表明,砂土在复杂应力条件下各个强度准则在描述砂土复杂应力条件下均能体现一定的规律性,但各个强度准则均存在一定误差,其常数项均表现出一定的变化,3σ动态空间滑动面准则表现出较好的一致性。

【Abstract】 In practical geotechnical engineering,widely used strength criteria include the MohrCoulomb,Drucker-Prager,and Matsuoka-Nakai criteria.These guidelines define the laws that should be obeyed by the stress on a certain spatially mobilized plane when geotechnical materials are damaged.These planes have different characteristics.The spatially mobilized plane of the Mohr-Coulomb criterion is orthogonal with large and small principal stress planes,and the angle between the major principal stress planes is 45°+φ/2.It is assumed that the ratio between the shear stress and the normal stress on the plane is constant;then,the Mohr-Coulomb criterion can be obtained.The Drucker-Prager criterion describes the law that should be obeyed by the principal stress on an octahedral plane when geotechnical material is damaged.That is,the ratio between shear stress and normal stress on an octahedral plane is constant when the geotechnical material is damaged.The plane with the same normal stress is orthogonal with the tendency of geometric space,and the angle between the axes is the same.If a corner of the orthogonal hexahedral principal stress unit is located in the origin of the axes of a three-dimensional geometric space,then a45°angle is present between the sliding surfaces in the space of three orthogonal planes intersecting the line with the axis.Based on the Mohr-Coulomb criterion,the Matsuoka-Nakai criterion presents a spatially mobilized plane(SMP)with non-fixed normal stress.The SMP is changed with the changes in principal stress.The intersection between the unit of main stress in the spatially mobilized plane and the axis of three-dimensional geometric space is respectively σ1,k σ2and k σ3,if the intersection is respectively k( σ1)n、k( σ2)n and k( σ3)n.Then,the spatially mobilized plane can be expanded to different dynamic spatially mobilized planes and different spatially mobilized plane strength criteria.On the basis of true triaxial tests on sand and the traditional principle of the spatially mobilized space,a variety of dynamic spatially mobilized spaces and appropriate strength criteria have been introduced.In this paper,the first-power dynamic spatially mobilized plane(σ),the quadratic-power dynamic spatially mobilized plane(σ),and the third-power dynamic spatially mobilized plane(3σ)are proposed.The essence of the quadratic dynamic spatially mobilized plane(σ)is same as the Matsuoka-Nakai criterion based on the SMP.If the ratio of the shear stress and normal stress on the surface of the dynamic spatially mobilized plane is equal to constant and has the same shear strength criterion as the axisymmetric triaxial compression failure of the Mohr-Coulomb criterion,the criterion of dynamic spatially mobilized plane can be obtained.On the basis of the true triaxial test data of sand,comparative analysis of the theoretical strength and the traditional strength as well as the newly established strength criterion and the actual strength of true triaxial test data is conducted.Through the analysis and comparison,the quantitative strength error of each criterion is determined.Comparative analysis shows that for the sand under complex stress conditions,each criterion can reflect certain regularity.However,certain errors are present,and the constant term changes with complex stress conditions.The3σ)dynamic spatially mobilized space strength criterion showed the best consistency.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金项目(41272320);贵州省自然科学基金项目(黔科合J字[2013]2011号)
  • 【文献出处】 地震工程学报 ,China Earthquake Engineering Journal , 编辑部邮箱 ,2014年04期
  • 【分类号】TU441
  • 【下载频次】53
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络