节点文献

桁架式跨河管架的优化设计及地震可靠性评价

Design Optimization and Seismic Reliability Analysis of Truss-type River-crossing Pipe Rack

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 俞然刚庄向仕周金顺朱海

【Author】 YU Ran-gang1,ZHUANG Xiang-shi2,ZHOU Jin-shun1,3,ZHU Hai1(1.College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering,China University of Petroleum,Qingdao Shandong 266580,China; 2.Huabei Petroleum Engineering Construction,China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau,Renqiu Hebei 062552,China; 3.Zhejiang Jinquli Natural Gas Co.,Ltd.,Zhenjiang Provincial Energy Group Company Ltd.,Huangzhou Zhejiang 310016,China)

【机构】 中国石油大学(华东)储运与建筑工程学院中石油管道局华北石油工程建设有限公司浙江省能源集团浙江金衢丽天然气有限公司

【摘要】 在管道穿跨越工程中,桁架式跨河管架是一种常见形式。本文在结构优化设计中分别对矩形桁架结构和倒三角形桁架结构两种方案进行优化,并对优化结果进行了比较分析,确定了结构最优方案。通过模拟结构在地震作用下的响应对结构的抗震性能进行了分析,并通过可靠性分析评价了结构的抗震可靠度。结果表明:适当增加结构高度和减小结构宽度对结构有利;结构的总重量随杆件截面尺寸的减小而迅速降低,10次优化循环后即从54t降至24t左右;三角形桁架比矩形桁架结构简单,重量减轻36%;可靠性分析表明结构的可靠度为99%。

【Abstract】 Oil and gas pipeline construction persists throughout China on national and regional levels.Because many barriers are encountered such as rivers,lakes,mountains,canyons,other construction,and unstable strata,access through and across these barriers are important in oil pipeline engineering design.Thus,construction reliability,safety,and economic impact have been studied.In cross projects,truss-type river-crossing pipe rack is a common form of medium-sized cross-projects because it has a simple structure,is light weight,and provides a convenient way to repair pipelines with ample space.The structure design optimization and seismic reliability analysis of truss-type river-crossing pipe racks are related to the overall performance and safe operation of pipeline structures.In this study,two scenarios of rectangular and inverted triangle truss structures were respectively optimized by using ANSYS parameter design language and a design optimization module,and the optimization results were analyzed to determine the most optimal solution.By simulating the structure’s earthquake response,seismic performance analysis was conducted,and the structure of anti-seismic reliability was obtained through reliability analysis for optimal structure design. The optimization results show that the height of the truss increases in the optimization process;however,the width is reduced.In addition,the diameter of pole gradually decreases in the process.The total weight of the structure rapidly reduces with rod cross-section reduction;reduction is rapid in the first three optimization cycles and slows from 54 tons to 25 tons after 10 optimization cycles to maintain a weight of 18.532 t.The analysis of internal force and largest structural displacement show that the structures make full use of material mechanics capability and that the appropriate increase in structural height and decrease in structural width are favorable to the structure.Optimization results show that the two types of structure forms show the same change trends in the optimization.The inversion triangle form has a more simple structure,fewer section species,and a more simple connect node construction than those of the rectangle form.Moreover,the inversion triangle form has weight reduction of 36% over the rectangle form;therefore,the cost of material and construction is less,and mechanics capability is more effective. Response spectrum and time history analyses reveal that earthquake activity in the horizontal direction results in stronger activity on the river-crossing pipe rack than that in the vertical direction because the width of the truss decreases in the optimization to increase vertical stiffness. Reliability analysis shows that the reliability of the structure is 99%.Failure probability of the structure maintains the probability permission bound of construction design.Therefore,the entire structure retains the guarantee probability of 99%.That is,the structure is safe and reliable under the earthquake activity and load. This study provides particular methods of using the ANSYS program for design optimization and seismic reliability analysis,which are helpful for maintaining construction expenses and operation safety.

【基金】 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(12CX06078A)
  • 【文献出处】 地震工程学报 ,China Earthquake Engineering Journal , 编辑部邮箱 ,2013年02期
  • 【分类号】TE832;P315.9
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】85
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络