节点文献

圆形隧道抗震分析若干近似解析方法比较研究

Comparison Research of Some Approximate Analytical Methods for Seismic Design of Circular Tunnel

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 晏启祥马婷婷吴林何川

【Author】 YAN Qixiang,MA Tingting,WU Lin,HE Chuan(School of Civil Engineering,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031,China)

【机构】 西南交通大学土木工程学院

【摘要】 为避免盾构隧道抗震设计动力时程分析的复杂性和减小计算工作量,对圆形隧道抗震设计的3种近似解析方法进行了比较.第1种是基于复变函数的近似解析方法,并用成层地层振动方程获得的地层剪切力进行了改进;第2种是基于贝塞尔函数的近似解析方法;第3种是基于弹性力学的近似解析方法.分别采用上述3种近似解析方法和反应位移法对某隧道进行了抗震分析.结果表明:前2种近似解析方法的计算结果较接近,规律大致相同,因此可用二者计算结果的最不利组合进行抗震分析;第3种近似解析方法较为粗略,只可用于圆形隧道抗震设计的前期估算.

【Abstract】 In order to cut down the complexity and workload of seismic analyses,three approximate analytical methods for seismic design of circular tunnels were discussed.The first one is based on the function of complex variable and improved by using shear stresses in strata gained by the vibration equation for stratification strata,the second one is founded on the Bessel function,and the third method is grounded on the theory of elasticity mechanics.Seismic analyses of a circular tunnel were carried out respectively using the three analytical methods and by numerical calculation based on the seismic deformation method.The results show that the first two analytical methods can obtain relatively close results,so it is feasible to carry out the seismic analysis by the worst combination of their calculation results,and the third analytical method can be only used at the preliminary stage of seismic design.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50878186);国家973计划资助课题(2010CB732105)
  • 【文献出处】 西南交通大学学报 ,Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University , 编辑部邮箱 ,2011年01期
  • 【分类号】U451.2
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】411
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络