节点文献

场地土动力特性识别方法对比

Comparison of Soil Dynamic Property Identification Method

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 陈隽赵冠宇祁晓煜史晓军

【Author】 CHEN Jun1,ZHAO Guan-yu2,QI Xiao-yu2,SHI Xiao-jun2(1.State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China;2.Department of Building Engineering,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China)

【机构】 同济大学土木工程防灾国家重点实验室同济大学建筑工程系

【摘要】 结合自由场地土振动台试验,对比了随机子空间迭代(SSI)方法、经验模式分解结合希尔伯特变换(EMD+HT)方法和频域分解(FDD)方法识别场地土卓越频率、阻尼比的适用性,以及不同激励类型、不同土层深度和大阻尼比情况对识别精度的影响。结果表明:对于随机激励,当阻尼比较小时,上述3种方法均能准确识别出场地土卓越频率;而大震时土体卓越频率、阻尼比与振动过程耦合,此时经验模式分解结合希尔伯特变换方法可以给出合理的识别结果。

【Abstract】 Combining free soil shaking table test,the predominant frequency of silty clay and its damping ratio used in series of shaking table test were identified by three commonly used methods,i.e.the stochastic subspace identification(SSI) method,frequency domain decomposition(FDD) method and empirical mode decomposition plus Hilbert transform(EMD+HT) method.The applicabilities of the three methods were verified and identification results were discussed in items of effect of input type,different soil depths and selection of calculating parameters concerning large damping ratio cases.The results show that the three methods are applicable for random excitation and small damping ratio cases;only empirical mode decomposition plus Hilbert transform method can produce reasonable results when soil predominant frequency and damping ratios are coupled with vibration process or subjected to strong earthquake.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金创新研究群体科学基金项目(50621062/E0805);土木工程防灾国家重点实验室基础研究项目(SLDRCE08-C-03)
  • 【文献出处】 建筑科学与工程学报 ,Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering , 编辑部邮箱 ,2009年02期
  • 【分类号】TU411.8
  • 【被引频次】2
  • 【下载频次】125
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络