节点文献

在边坡局部失稳中传递系数法与强度折减法的计算比较

The Calculation Comparison of Transfer Coefficient Method with Strength Reduction Finite Element Method in Slope Local Instability

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 李荣建刘军定闫蕊郑文陈雅琴

【Author】 LI Rongjian;LIU Junding;YAN Rui;ZHENG Wen;CHEN Yaqin;Institute of Geotechnical Engineering,Xi’an University of Technology;Yulin University;

【机构】 西安理工大学岩土工程研究所榆林学院

【摘要】 在考虑非饱和基质吸力条件下,基于传递系数法的计算原理,开发了可考虑基质吸力的传递系数法相关计算程序,并且针对下土地岭边坡进行了稳定性分析,同时与强度折减有限元计算结果进行了比较研究。对于具有滑带、坡体狭长不规则等特点的下土地岭边坡,可能存在局部滑动先于沿整体滑带滑动的失稳情况。研究结果表明,考虑基质吸力逐步减弱直至丧失的过程中,传递系数法与强度折减有限元法均可在一定程度上反映非饱和土边坡的安全系数降低的现象,但传递系数法在分析边坡的局部滑动问题中具有明显的局限性,而强度折减有限元法则可以通过计算的位移增量云图和等值线确定潜在的局部滑动面。

【Abstract】 In the condition of taking the unsaturated matric suction into consideration,based on the principle of the traditional transfer coefficient method,this paper develops a corresponding program on transfer coefficient method with considering matric suction,and analyzes the stability of Tudiling slope.At the same time,comparison of the results of the transfer coefficient method is made with that of the strength reduction finite element method.For the Tudiling slope being narrow in thickness and irregular in shape,there may exist a kind of instability that the sliding of local surface is earlier than that of whole slide belt.The results show that,with matric suction gradually decreasing,the transfer coefficient method and the strength reduction finite element method both can reflect the decrease of safety factor in the unsaturated soil slope,but the transfer coefficient method has obvious difficulty in analyzing the local sliding,while the strength reduction finite element method is advantageous to determine the potential local sliding surface through the isoclines of incremental displacement.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金资助项目(11072193);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20100481354);陕西省教育厅科研计划资助项目(12JK0907)
  • 【文献出处】 西安理工大学学报 ,Journal of Xi’an University of Technology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2013年03期
  • 【分类号】TU43
  • 【被引频次】4
  • 【下载频次】147
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络