节点文献

压电驱动平台的自适应PID控制

Adaptive PID Control of Piezoelectric Drive Platform

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 曾佑轩马立钟博文孙立宁汪文峰

【Author】 ZENG You-xuan;MA Li;ZHONG Bo-wen;SUN Li-Ning;WANG Wen-feng;Shanghai University;Suzhou University;

【机构】 上海大学苏州大学

【摘要】 为了辨识出最优的PID控制参数,建立压电驱动平台传动系统的动力学模型;根据压电陶瓷实际的迟滞特性曲线的非对称性,改进为非对称的PI迟滞模型,形成基于改进PI迟滞模型的前馈PID控制。采用基于改进的单神经元自适应PID控制算法和基于BP神经网络的PID控制算法,实现PID参数的在线实时调整。搭建压电陶瓷驱动平台实验系统,并进行闭环控制实验。结果显示,驱动平台在前馈PID控制、单神经元自适应PID控制算法及基于BP神经网络自整定PID控制算法下的平均定位误差分别为16.5 nm,8.3 nm及5.1 nm。自适应PID闭环控制精度优于前馈PID控制,神经网络整定PID控制精度高于单神经元自适应PID控制。

【Abstract】 In order to identify the optimal PID control parameters,the dynamic model of the piezoelectric drive platform transmission system was established. According to the asymmetry of the actual hysteresis curve of the piezoelectric ceramic,the asymmetric PI delay model was improved,a feed-forward PID control based on improved PI hysteresis model was formed. A way of adjusting the PID parameters online was put forward,which is based on the improved single neuron adaptive PID control algorithm and PID control algorithm of BP neural network. The experimental system of piezoelectric ceramic drive platform was established and carried out. Closed-loop control experiments show that the average positioning error of the drive platform in feed-forward PID control,single neuron adaptive PID control algorithm and PID neural network self-tuning PID control algorithm is 16.5 nm,8.3 nm,and 5.1 nm,respectively. Adapting PID closed loop control accuracy is better than feed-forward PID control,neural network tuning PID control accuracy is higher than single neuron adaptive PID control.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金项目(61573238);上海市自然科学基金项目(13ZR1415800)
  • 【文献出处】 微特电机 ,Small & Special Electrical Machines , 编辑部邮箱 ,2019年08期
  • 【分类号】TN384;TP273
  • 【网络出版时间】2019-08-22 14:13
  • 【被引频次】5
  • 【下载频次】396
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络