【摘要】 在当前社会的公共冲突治理中,呈现出短期缓解与长效化解两种较有差异的绩效。为解释这种差异性,本文提出了治理规则的"生产-执行"分析框架,并对三个社区的案例过程及其效果展开比较分析。研究发现,在公共规则的生产和执行过程中,第三方主体和利益相关者的关系,影响规则认同度和违规行为的监督效度,引发了不同的规则实践形态。第三方对规则生产和执行的包揽或介入,利益相关者的规则认同较低,且监督乏力,会出现短期有效执行,长期则冲突去而复返;当利益相关者自主开展规则的生产和执行,则会形成高度的规则认同和有力的监督,实现冲突的长效治理。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the current social public conflict governance,there are two different kinds of performance:short-term relief and long-term effect.In order to explain this difference,this paper utilizes an analytic framework"production-implementation"of governance rules,and presents a comparative analysis of the process and its effects across three communities.The study shows that during the production and implementation of the public rules,the relationship between stakeholders and the third party influences the degree of rule-identity and supervision validity,resulting in different outcomes.When the third party undertake the whole task of production and execution of the rules or is involved in the process,the rule-identity of stakeholders are low,level of supervision is low,which results in effective implementation in the shortterm,yetconflict returning in the long term.When the stakeholders independently carry out the production and implementation of the rules,they manifest a high level of rule-identity and high level of supervision,which results inan effective long-term governance of conflict.更多还原