节点文献

Debris flow impact on flexible barrier: effects of debrisbarrier stiffness and flow aspect ratio

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 SONG Dong-riZHOU Gordon G.D.CHOI Clarence EdwardZHENG Yun

【Author】 SONG Dong-ri;ZHOU Gordon G.D.;CHOI Clarence Edward;ZHENG Yun;Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Process/Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology;The HKUST Jockey Club Institute for Advanced Study;State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences;

【通讯作者】 ZHOU Gordon G.D.;

【机构】 Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Process/Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyThe HKUST Jockey Club Institute for Advanced StudyState Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences

【摘要】 Conventionally, flexible barriers are rated based on their ability to resist a free-falling boulder with a particular input energy. However, there is still no well-accepted approach for evaluating performance of flexible barrier under debris flow impact. In this study, a large-nonlinear finite-element model was used to back-analyze centrifuge tests to discern the effects of impact material type, barrier stiffness, and flow aspect ratio(flow height to flow length) on the reaction force between the impacting medium and flexible barrier. Results show that, in contrast to flexible barriers for resisting rockfall, the normal impact force induced by the highly frictional and viscous debris is insensitive to barrier stiffness. This is because the elongated distributions of kinetic energy are mainly dissipated by the internal and boundary shearing, and only a small portion is forwarded to the barrier. Furthermore, a new stiffness number is proposed to characterize the equivalent stiffness between a debris flow or a boulder, and a flexible barrier. Under the circumstance of an extremely elongated debris flow event, i.e., low aspect ratio, the load on a barrier is dominated by the static component and thus not sensitive to the barrier stiffness.

【Abstract】 Conventionally, flexible barriers are rated based on their ability to resist a free-falling boulder with a particular input energy. However, there is still no well-accepted approach for evaluating performance of flexible barrier under debris flow impact. In this study, a large-nonlinear finite-element model was used to back-analyze centrifuge tests to discern the effects of impact material type, barrier stiffness, and flow aspect ratio(flow height to flow length) on the reaction force between the impacting medium and flexible barrier. Results show that, in contrast to flexible barriers for resisting rockfall, the normal impact force induced by the highly frictional and viscous debris is insensitive to barrier stiffness. This is because the elongated distributions of kinetic energy are mainly dissipated by the internal and boundary shearing, and only a small portion is forwarded to the barrier. Furthermore, a new stiffness number is proposed to characterize the equivalent stiffness between a debris flow or a boulder, and a flexible barrier. Under the circumstance of an extremely elongated debris flow event, i.e., low aspect ratio, the load on a barrier is dominated by the static component and thus not sensitive to the barrier stiffness.

【基金】 support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51809261, 11672318, and 51709052);financial support from the Theme-based Research Grant T22-603/15N;the General Research Fund 16209717 provided by the Research Grants Council of the Government of Hong Kong SAR, China;financial support by the Hong Kong Jockey Club Disaster Preparedness and Response Institute (HKJCDPRI18EG01)
  • 【文献出处】 Journal of Mountain Science ,Journal of Mountain Science 山地科学学报(英文版) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2019年07期
  • 【分类号】P642.23
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】13
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络