节点文献

两种残余变形模型计算结果对比分析

Comparative analysis of calculated results by using two residual deformation models

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 杨青坡邹德高李云清杨小龙

【Author】 YANG Qingpo;ZOU Degao;LI Yunqing;YANG Xiaolong;School of Hydraulic Engineering,Dalian University of Technology;State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering,Dalian University of Technology;

【机构】 大连理工大学水利工程学院大连理工大学海岸和近海工程国家重点试验室

【摘要】 为研究修正的沈珠江残余变形模型和双曲线残余变形模型的异同及其在实际工程中适应性,在同一条件下开展了面板坝二维有限元计算,对残余应变和坝体永久变形进行分析。研究结果表明:1强震荷载作用下两个模型计算结果总体规律一致。2考虑平均主应力影响的双曲线模型能更好地反映坝顶及其附近的残余变形规律。3残余体应变在双曲线模型中对永久位移值的贡献要小于其在修正沈珠江模型中的贡献。残余体应变对面板坝永久变形的影响要小于残余剪应变。

【Abstract】 A two- dimensional finite element analysis of CFRD is carried out to study the residual deformation and permanent deformation under the same condition by using modified Shenzhujiang residual deformation model and hyperbolic residual deformation model respectively to explore their differences and the applicability in practical calculations. The results show that:(1) the general principles of the two models are identical under the strong earthquake load;(2) the residual deformation at the dam crest and the nearby region simulated by the hyperbolic model is more precise because the mean principle stress is taken into account;(3) the contribution of the residual volumetric strain to the permanent displacement in the hyperbolic model is relatively lower than that in Shenzhujiang Model; the influence of the residual volumetric strain on the permanent deformation is lower than that of the residual shear strain.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金项目(51279025,51379028);新世纪优秀人才支持计划资助(NCET-12-0083)
  • 【分类号】TV312
  • 【被引频次】1
  • 【下载频次】82
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络