节点文献

煤层底板突水评价的新型实用方法Ⅴ:基于GIS的ANN型、证据权型、Logistic回归型脆弱性指数法的比较

A new practical methodology of coal seam floor water burst evaluation:the comparison study among ANN,the weight of evidence and the logistic regression vulnerable index method based on GIS

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 武强张波赵文德刘守强

【Author】 WU Qiang1,ZHANG Bo1,ZHAO Wen-de2,LIU Shou-qiang1(1.Institute of Water Hazard Prevention and Water Resources,China University of Mining and Technology(Beijing),Beijing 100083,China;2.Environmental Impact Assessment Research Center,Environmental Development Center of Ministry of Environment Protection,Beijing 100029,China)

【机构】 中国矿业大学(北京)水害防治与水资源研究所环保部环境发展中心环境影响评价研究中心

【摘要】 为解决煤层底板突水预测预报评价难题,在煤层底板突水主控指标体系和脆弱性指数法提出的基础上,以峰峰九龙矿煤层底板突水为研究对象,分别应用新提出的基于GIS的ANN型、证据权型、Logistic回归型脆弱性指数法对该矿煤层底板突水进行了预测评价,并分别生成煤层底板突水脆弱性分区图,并对3种预测评价结果进行了详细对比和拟合分析,总结提出了3种预测评价方法的适用条件和他们各自的特点及优劣。

【Abstract】 In order to solve the difficult evaluation problems of coal seam floor water burst,based on the vulnerable index method and main controlling index system for floor water burst,the coal seam floor water burst in the whole area of Jiulong Coal Mine in Fengfeng was studied.Through applying ANN,weight of evidence and logistic regression,as well as the new styles of the vulnerable index method,the coal seam floor of the mine was evaluated and pictures were produced as the vulnerable zone of the coal seam floor water burst.Finally,three evaluated results were compared and analyzed,and the applicable conditions,the advantages and weaknesses of each method were also presented.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51174289,41102180);教育部创新团队联合资助项目(IRT1085)
  • 【文献出处】 煤炭学报 ,Journal of China Coal Society , 编辑部邮箱 ,2013年01期
  • 【分类号】TD745
  • 【被引频次】57
  • 【下载频次】1248
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络