节点文献

生态环境损害赔偿诉讼中证明责任分配规则研究

Study on Distribution of Burden of Proof in the Lawsuit of Ecological Environmental Damage Compensation

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 陈悦悦

【Author】 CHEN Yue-yue;College of Law,Anhui University;

【机构】 安徽大学法学院

【摘要】 2017年中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅印发的《生态环境损害赔偿制度改革方案》提出了至2020年初步建成生态环境损害赔偿制度的总体要求,而目前我国生态环境损害赔偿制度在理论与实践方面均有不同程度的欠缺。通过对我国生态损害赔偿诉讼涉及的实体法与程序法中证明责任分配规则进行全面梳理,发现存在法律规范的缺位、直接适用传统环境侵权诉讼举证责任倒置规则存在不合理性等问题,建议尽快出台相关司法解释,建立类型化的环境污染纠纷证明责任分配规则,兼顾司法公平和环境正义。

【Abstract】 At present, China’s ecological environmental damage compensation system is deficient in theory and practice. Through our country ecological damage compensation litigation involving the substantive law and procedural law of the burden of proof allocation rules for comprehensive combing, We find the absence of legal norms, directly applicable rules of traditional environmental tort lawsuit onus probandi inversion problems such as irrationality, suggest that a relevant judicial explanation should be set forth as soon as possible, establish environmental pollution dispute the burden of proof and typed distribution rules, balance the judicial justice and environmental justice.

  • 【文献出处】 牡丹江大学学报 ,Journal of Mudanjiang University , 编辑部邮箱 ,2019年07期
  • 【分类号】D922.68;D925.1
  • 【被引频次】4
  • 【下载频次】576
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络