【摘要】 应用车辆-轨道非线性耦合动力学模型,分析了采用解析方法的模态叠加法、有限元法的模态叠加法和有限元法的直接积分法求解车辆-轨道耦合动力学钢轨模型的计算精度与计算效率。选取Bernoulli-Euler梁或Rayleigh-Timoshenko梁模拟钢轨,采用不同类型单元离散钢轨模型,并利用显式积分方法求解车辆-轨道耦合动力学的响应。计算结果表明:当采用Bernoulli-Euler梁钢轨模型和轨道激励频率较低时,采用协调质量阵的直接积分法计算时间是解析方法的模态叠加法的28.8倍,各种计算方法的计算结果接近;当采用Rayleigh-Timoshenko梁钢轨模型和轨道激励频率较低时,可以忽略Rayleigh-Timoshenko梁的转动惯量对车辆-轨道耦合动力学模型的响应影响;解析法的模态叠加法的计算时间比混合单元的慢64.5%。更多还原

【Abstract】 The computational accuracies and efficiencies of different methods for solving dynamic rail model were investigated with vehicle-track nonlinear coupling dynamics model.The methods were modal superposition method based on analytical expression,modal superposition method based on FEM,and direct integration method based on FEM.Rail was modeled by Bernoulli-Euler beam or Rayleigh-Timoshenko beam,and rail model was divided by different types of elements.The response of vehicle-track coupling dynamics was solved with explicit integration method.Calculation result indicates that the computational time of direct integration method based on consistent mass matrix is 28.8 times than that of modal superposition based on analytical expression when rail is modeled by Bernoulli-Euler beam and track excitation frequency is lower,and the computational accuracies of the methods are nearly same.The response influence of rotatory inertia for Rayleigh-Timoshenko beam in vehicle-track coupling dynamics model can be neglected when rail is modeled by Rayleigh-Timoshenko beam and track excitation frequency is lower.The computational time of modal superposition method based on analytical expression is 64.5% slower than that of hybrid element.4 tabs,12 figs,16 refs.更多还原