节点文献

关于北京互联网法院案件管辖与立案审查的思考

Reflections on the Jurisdiction and Case Filing Review Mechanism of Beijing Internet Court

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 杨艳张培森

【Author】 YANG Yan;ZHANG Peisen;

【机构】 北京市高级人民法院立案庭

【摘要】 互联网法院案件管辖范围和立案审查规则的合理设定,一方面有利于互联网法院加强网络空间治理,提升中国在互联网领域的规则制定权和话语权;另一方面有利于界分互联网法院与普通法院的案件管辖职责,减少案件管辖的争议。同时,管辖范围和立案审查规则的明确和统一,也便利当事人行使诉讼权利。本文结合互联网法院成立以来的生动案例,对互联网法院立案审查面临的挑战进行了分析和评估,在此基础上,对互联网法院管辖的重要案件类型的审查要点进行了细致的探讨,以求对互联网法院管辖范围标准的明晰和完善有所助益。

【Abstract】 The reasonable rulemaking for the jurisdiction and filing review of the Internet court is beneficial in that not only the role of the Internet court in cyberspace governance is strengthened, gaining greater say and influence for China in this regard, it is also conducive for the distinguishing between the jurisdiction of Internet and ordinary courts, thereby reducing jurisdictional disputes of the case. At the same time, the clarity and unification for the jurisdiction and the case filing reviewing rules also facilitate the exercise of rights for disputing parties. Basing on the cases of the Internet court since its establishment, this paper analyzes and evaluates the challenges faced by it. It also discusses in details the main points of jurisdictional review for important cases for Internet courts, for the clarification and improvement of its jurisdictional standards.

  • 【文献出处】 经贸法律评论 ,Business and Economic Law Review , 编辑部邮箱 ,2019年03期
  • 【分类号】D926.23
  • 【被引频次】7
  • 【下载频次】815
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络