【摘要】 科技政策对构建国家创新体系及带动地区经济发展有关键作用,然而,科技政策如何影响我国区域生产率增长,以及对不同区域影响路径的差异性仍有待厘清。本文利用2003—2016年我国大陆31个省份面板数据,按照创新创业水平,使用聚类分析划分为四个区域,并引入创新创业构建链式中介回归方程,以深入探究科技政策对区域生产率增长的作用机理。结果显示,创新创业在科技政策与区域生产率关系中的链式中介作用没有存在于创新创业水平最高的区域,而存在于创新创业水平较高的区域,在创新创业水平较低和最低区域则仅存在直接效应。基于实证分析结果,本文提出应根据各区域创新创业水平制定科技政策、根据不同区域的资源配置程度调整创新创业对区域生产率的协同带动作用的政策建议。更多还原

【Abstract】 China has paid a heavy environmental cost in high-speed and long-term industrial development. Since the concept of "two-oriented society"(resource-saving and environment-friendly) is put forward in"Report on Government Work"which is reported in Tenth National People’s Congress in 2007, China has been exploring the mode of sustainable economic development for more than ten years. With the role of innovative technology in resource conservation and sustainable economic development becoming increasingly prominent,"Report on the Work of the Government of the State Council" of 2015-2018 determined innovation, entrepreneurship, reform and development as the key words of the future work of the Chinese government. China’s GDP growth has slowed down at present, the impact of the Troika(investment, consumption and export) on China’s economic development has been weakened and China is facing enormous pressure from sustainable economic development. Therefore, Innovation, entrepreneurship and related technology policy play a more significant role in the sustainable development of China’s economy and have widely been discussed in theory and industry.Nowadays, many scholars have affirmed that entrepreneurship is an important way to commercialize innovation, and that technology policy have a positive impact on innovation and entrepreneurship. However, the original intention of the introduction of technology policy is to promote the development of regional technology and productivity, but there is less academic research on the impact of technology policy on regional productivity growth, and it is even more rare to explore the intermediary role of innovation and entrepreneurship in the relationship between technology policy and regional productivity. Moreover, the land area of our country is very wide, because of different regions and regional human environments, innovation, entrepreneurship and related technology policy have different effects on regional productivity growth and economic sustainable development in our country. Specifically, the difference of regional innovation and entrepreneurship level is not entirely bounded by geographical location, but also shows the difference between cross-spatial clustering and "cluster"; Therefore, we should not only clarify the impact path of technology policy on regional productivity growth, but also look for cross-spatial criteria for regional division, the degree of development of regional innovation and entrepreneurship, and the similarities and differences of regional technology policy, in order to effectively issue targeted technology policy in accordance with regional realities, to ensure the sustainable development of the regional economy.This study divides the spatial regions according to the clustering results of innovation and entrepreneurship level, and deeply analyzes the specific path of the impact of technology policy on productivity growth in different regions. Therefore, this study has four aspects of important theoretical and practical significance. First of all, this study uses panel data of 31 provinces in China, using cluster analysis to cluster 31 provinces into four regions(I-IV), thus enriching the cross-spatial regional productivity research. Secondly, based on the theoretical review, this study introduces agency variables for technology policy, entrepreneurship, innovation and regional productivity, which not only perfects the measurement of technology policy, innovation and entrepreneurship, but also provides a reference for relevant empirical research. Thirdly, different from the previous single intermediary research, this study realizes the integration of technology policy-entrepreneurship-innovation-regional productivity in different regional relations, and provides a new idea for the study of chain intermediary effect. Finally, through the test of the results of chain intermediary effect in different regions, this study puts forward that technology policy should be formulated and perfected according to the characteristics of inland areas, ethnic minorities and economically underdeveloped areas. According to the degree of resource allocation in different regions, increase the synergistic driving effect of innovation and entrepreneurship on regional productivity should be increased according to different standards, the radiation of technology policy on productivity throughout the country should be taken into account and even strengthened at the same time.更多还原