节点文献

相对运动法与绝对位移直接求解法算法误差分析

Error Analysis between Relative Motion Solving Method and Absolute Displacement Direct Solving Method

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 李永华桂国庆

【Author】 LI Yong-hua1,GUI Guo-qing2,1 (1.School of Architecture and Civil Engineering,Nanchang University,Nanchang 330031,P.R.China; 2.School of Technology,Jinggangshan University,Ji’an 343009,Jiangxi,P.R.China)

【机构】 南昌大学建筑工程学院井冈山大学工学院

【摘要】 多点激励地震响应分析过程中,相对运动法和绝对位移直接求解法分别假定阻尼与内部节点相对速度、绝对速度成比例,由于阻尼假定的不一致,计算结果可能存在误差。采用随机振动分析方法对瑞利阻尼模型下2种求解方法计算结果之间的误差进行了理论分析,得出了2种算法下结构动态响应功率谱密度误差主要受激励频率与结构基频的比值、结构阻尼比影响的结论,然后从概率统计意义上得出了2种算法下结构动态响应方差误差与结构阻尼比的关系,并进行了相关算例数值论证。最后得出如下结论:2种算法计算结果误差随阻尼比的减小而减小,当结构阻尼比不大于5%时,2种算法计算结果误差基本可忽略。

【Abstract】 Under multi-support earthquake excitation,the damping is proportional to the relative velocity in relative motion method,While the damping is proportional to the absolute velocity in method of direct solving absolute displacement,and the damping assuming difference may cause the calculation errors on structural responses.The structural response errors of the dynamic component of power spectral density between the two solving methods are derived by random vibration theoretical analysis in Rayleigh damping model,which include damping ratio and the ratio between excitation frequency and fundamental frequency of the structures.Based on probability theory,the variation errors of dynamic component response between the two solving methods are also derived by theoretical analysis,and some numerical examples are provided to verify the error analysis.At last,it is pointed out that the calculation errors between the two solving methods decrease with damping ratio,and it is negligible when the damping ratio of structure is less than 5%.

【基金】 国家自然科学基金项目(51068008、51168037);江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目(GJJ10354);江西省自然科学基金项目(2009GZW0011)
  • 【文献出处】 土木建筑与环境工程 ,Journal of Civil,Architectural & Environmental Engineering , 编辑部邮箱 ,2011年05期
  • 【分类号】TU311.3
  • 【被引频次】11
  • 【下载频次】129
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络