节点文献

不同类型钢-混凝土组合剪力墙超高层结构抗震性能对比

Comparison of Seismic Behavior of Super-Tall Building Structures with Different Type of Steel-Concrete Composite Shear Walls

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 蒋欢军左欢崔龙飞

【Author】 JIANG Huanjun1,2,* ZUO Huan1,2 CUI Longfei3(1.Research Institute of Structural Engineering and Disaster Reduction,Shanghai 200092,China; 2.State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering,Shanghai 20092,China; 3.China Shanghai Institute of Architectural Design & Research(Co.,Ltd),Shanghai 200063,China)

【机构】 同济大学结构工程与防灾研究所同济大学土木工程防灾国家重点实验室中国建筑上海设计研究院有限公司

【摘要】 采用结构分析软件Perform-3D对分别带有内置钢板混凝土组合剪力墙、内藏钢桁架混凝土组合剪力墙以及传统的型钢混凝土剪力墙的框架-核心筒结构进行静力和动力弹塑性分析,研究了三种剪力墙对整体结构的动力特性、位移反应和地震损伤的影响。研究表明,带有三种组合剪力墙的结构整体抗震性能优劣顺序依次为内置钢板混凝土组合剪力墙结构、内藏钢桁架混凝土组合剪力墙结构、型钢混凝土组合剪力墙结构。

【Abstract】 The seismic performance of frame-core tube structures with steel plate reinforced concrete(RC) shear wall,RC shear wall with concealed steel truss,and traditional steel reinforced concrete shear wall are investigated respectively by conducting dynamic and static elasto-plastic analysis with the aid of structural analysis software Perform-3D.Influences of three types of composite shear walls on the dynamic characteristics,displacement responses,and seismic damage of the whole structure are investigated.The study indicates that the seismic performance of the structure with steel plate RC shear walls is the best and that of the structure with RC shear wall with concealed steel truss is better than that of the structure with troditional steel reinforced concrete shear wall.

【基金】 国家科技支撑计划课题(2012BAJ13B02)
  • 【文献出处】 结构工程师 ,Structural Engineers , 编辑部邮箱 ,2012年05期
  • 【分类号】TU973.14
  • 【被引频次】2
  • 【下载频次】202
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络