节点文献

以电子方式作出行政行为的法学解读——概念、理论与规制

Jurisprudential Interpretation of Administrative Action by Electronic Means —— Concept, Theory and Regulation

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 刘国

【Author】 LIU Guo;China University of Political Science and Law;

【机构】 中国政法大学法学院

【摘要】 电子方式是一种不同于书面方式的新型法律行为方式。以告知为基准时点,以状态为主要标准,可将在告知行政相对人时呈现出数据电文状态的行政行为界定为"以电子方式作出的行政行为"。电子方式的运用当然有助于提升行政效能,彰显现代科技手段的"工具理性"和"效率理性",但是,控制行政权始终在现代行政法的双重任务中占据主导地位,以电子方式作出的行政行为只有以"控权保民"为基础才可能实现执法效益的最大化。以现代行政法控权方式的多元化趋势为背景,运用电子方式作出行政行为更多地应当受到法律保留原则、平等对待原则以及行政正当原则的规制。

【Abstract】 Electronic means is a new type of method for legal act different from the means of writing. Taking notification as the benchmark time point and status as the main criterion, the administrative action that presents the status of data message when informing the administrative counterpart can be defined as "administrative action taken through electronic means". The application of electronic means can definitely help to improve administrative efficiency and highlight the "instrumental rationality" and "efficiency rationality" of modern scientific and technological method. However, the control of administrative power is always dominant in the dual tasks of modern administrative law. The administrative action taken through electronic means can maximize the effectiveness of law enforcement only on the basis of "controlling the power and safeguarding the people’s rights". In the context of the diversified trend of modern administrative law control mode, the administrative action by electronic means should be more regulated by public law principles such as the principle of law reservation, the principle of equal treatment and the principle of administrative justification.

【基金】 国家社科基金重大课题“中国特色国家监察理论构建、制度创新与实践运行研究”(18ZDA135)
  • 【文献出处】 华中科技大学学报(社会科学版) ,Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition) , 编辑部邮箱 ,2019年04期
  • 【分类号】D912.1
  • 【被引频次】4
  • 【下载频次】381
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络