【摘要】 党的十九大首次提出"人与自然是生命共同体"的重要理念,全方位着力解决突出的环境问题,我国法治生态文明建设任重而道远。《刑法修正案(八)》将重大污染环境事故罪罪名修改为污染环境罪,是我国环境刑事立法完善进程的一项重大成果。而S市水污染案罪名之争,无疑是这一重大成果实现的重要推动力。该案罪名的变化,蕴含着司法机关在立法滞后情境下对法律适用的诸多两难选择。回溯该案的意义,在于以全新的法治生态文明理念为指导、以实证借鉴为基础,从刑事政策、正义需求、理念创新等多维度突破实践困境、平衡社会价值,以实现惩治犯罪、保护环境、促进法治之目的。更多还原

【Abstract】 For the first time, the Nineteen Congress of the Party put forward the important idea of"human and nature is the community of life",and to solve the outstanding environmental problems in all directions. The construction of ecological civilization in China’s rule of law is a heavy and long way to go. The Criminal Law Amendment environment. It was a major achievement in the process of perfecting the environmental criminal legislation in China. The dispute over the charges of water pollution in S City was undoubtedly an important driving force to achieve this great achievement. The change of the charges implied many difficult decisions for the judiciary to apply to the law in the lag behind legislation. The significance of this case is to break through the practical predicament and balance the social value from the criminal policy,the demand for justice and the innovation of ideas,so as to achieve the purpose of punishing the crime, protecting the environment and promoting the rule of law,based on the new concept of ecological civilization of the rule of law as the guidance and empirical reference.更多还原