节点文献

AP1000与传统压水堆物项分级的比较与分析

Comparison and Analysis for Item Classifications Between AP1000 and Traditional PWR

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 罗水云刘小燕

【Author】 LUO Shuiyun,LIU Xiaoyan (CPI Jiangxi Nuclear Power Company,Jiujiang 332000,China)

【机构】 中电投江西核电有限公司

【摘要】 通过对AP1000技术与传统压水堆物项的安全分级、抗震分类、规范等级和质量保证分级4种分级的方法、依据、参考标准和适用范围等进行比较分析,得出AP1000各种分级既保证安全,又经济合理,而且提出AP1000技术国产化过程中,应制定符合国情的质量保证分级方法和相应的质量保证要求。

【Abstract】 The comparison and analysis for the safety classification,seismic category,code classification and QA classification between AP1000 and traditional PWR were presented.The safety could be guaranteed and the construction and manufacture costs could be cut down since all sorts of AP1000 classifications. It is suggested that the QA classification and the QA requirements correspond to the national conditions should be drafted in the process of AP1000 domestication.

  • 【分类号】TM623.91
  • 【被引频次】6
  • 【下载频次】106
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络