节点文献

部分柱顶滑移钢筋混凝土框剪结构模型试验研究

MODEL TEST OF RC FRAME-SHEAR WALL STRUCTURE WITH PARTIAL COLUMNS SLIDING AT UPPER ENDS

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 吴波吕文龙沈朝勇

【Author】 WU Bo;L Wen-long;SHEN Chao-yong;State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science,South China Univ. of Technology;State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science,South China Univ.of Technology;Guangdong Provincial Academy of Building Research;Earthquake Engineering Research Test Center, Guangzhou University;

【机构】 华南理工大学亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室广东省建筑科学研究院广州大学工程抗震中心

【摘要】 开展了部分柱顶滑移钢筋混凝土框剪结构模型(模型B)与传统框剪结构模型(模型A)的地震模拟振动台对比试验,两模型均为三层两跨两开间,平面布置相同,几何相似比1∶10,第二层为结构薄弱层。此外,还进行了摩擦支座的力学性能试验,确定了支座摩擦系数的取值范围。研究发现:1)无润滑油时聚四氟乙烯+不锈钢镜面板摩擦支座的摩擦系数均值约0.070~0.095,有润滑油时该类摩擦支座的摩擦系数均值约0.014~0.018;2)不同峰值地震波作用下,模型B的薄弱层层间最大位移角、最大顶点相对位移、薄弱层最大绝对加速度和顶层最大绝对加速度分别比模型A降低20%~43%、17%~32%、12%~22%和7%~33%;3)模型B各层的最大层间剪力均不同程度小于模型A。因此,部分柱顶滑移钢筋混凝土框剪结构具有比传统框剪结构更优的抗震性能。

【Abstract】 Comparative shaking table tests were conducted for a reinforced concrete(RC) structural model with partial columns sliding at upper ends(Model B) and an ordinary RC structural model(Model A). The two models with an identical plan layout were 1/10-scale, 3-storey and 2-bay by 2-bay frame-shear wall structures, and the second storey of either model was the weak storey. In addition, the mechanical performances of two friction supports were tested to determine the range of a friction coefficient. Test results show that: 1) the average value of the friction coefficient for the friction supports composed of Teflon and stainless steel mirror plates without lubrication oil is about 0.070~0.095, while that with lubrication oil is about 0.014~0.018; 2) the maximum inter-storey drift ratios related to the weak story, the maximum relative displacements related to the top storey, the maximum absolute accelerations related to the weak storey, and the maximum absolute accelerations related to the top storey for Model B under earthquakes with different peak ground accelerations are, respectively, 20%~43%, 17%~32%, 12%~22%, and 7%~33% less than those for Model A; and 3) the maximum inter-storey shear forces related to each floor of Model B are all less than those of Model A. Generally, the aseismic performances of the RC frame-shear wall structures with partial columns sliding at upper ends are better than those of the ordinary RC frame-shear wall structures.

【基金】 国家基金重大研究计划培育项目(90815012);国家杰出青年科学基金项目(51025829);亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室重点研究项目(2009ZA04)
  • 【文献出处】 工程力学 ,Engineering Mechanics , 编辑部邮箱 ,2015年02期
  • 【分类号】TU398.2
  • 【被引频次】3
  • 【下载频次】88
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络