节点文献

社会组织参与社会治理的法律困境及其出路——以泰州天价环境诉讼案为例

The Legal Predicament of Social Organization Participating in Social Governance and Its Way Out

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 韩业斌

【Author】 Han Yebin;

【机构】 浙江大学光华法学院盐城师范学院法政学院

【摘要】 泰州天价环境诉讼案虽然是社会组织参与社会治理的一个重要案例,但是泰州市环保联合会的官方背景,以及新《环境保护法》对环保类社会组织的过多限制体现了国家在社会组织管理上的管控模式。当前我国社会组织活动的法律困境主要体现在国家对社会组织的严格管控,表现在立法理念、制度设计等诸多方面。破除国家对社会组织的管控模式,主要路径在于摒弃管制主义立法策略,树立培育理念,利用国家权力培植社会组织,变革双重登记制度,完善社会组织内部治理和社会组织参与纠纷解决的机制。

【Abstract】 Taizhou whopping environmental lawsuit is an important case in which social organizations participate in social governance. However, the official background of Taizhou Environmental Protection Association and the excessive restriction of the new Environmental Protection Law on environmental protection social organizations reflect the management mode of the state in managing social organizations. At present, the legal predicament of social organization activities in China is mainly reflected in the strict control of social organizations by the state, in many aspects, such as legislative idea, system design and so on. To break down the mode of state control over social organizations, the main path is to abandon the legislative strategy of control, to establish the concept of cultivation, to use state power to cultivate social organizations, to reform the dual registration system, to improve the internal governance of social organizations and to perfect the multiple dispute resolution mechanism for social organizations to participate in social governance.

【基金】 国家社会科学基金重大项目“法治国家、法治政府、法治社会一体建设进程中的地方实践研究”(项目编号:14ZDC007);浙江省博士后科研资助项目“法治一体建设背景下的地方法治先导区实践研究”的阶段性成果
  • 【分类号】D920.5;D922.68
  • 【被引频次】2
  • 【下载频次】368
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络