节点文献

经验模态分解中多种边界处理方法的比较研究

Methods for Mitigation of End Effect in Empirical Mode Decomposition: A Quantitative Comparison

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 胡维平莫家玲龚英姬赵方伟杜明辉

【Author】 Hu Wei-ping① Mo Jia-ling② Gong Ying-ji② Zhao Fang-wei③ Du Ming-hui① ①(Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China) ②(College of Physics and Information Technology, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, China) ③(School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia)

【机构】 华南理工大学电子与信息学院广西师范大学物理与信息学院西澳大学机械工程学院华南理工大学电子与信息学院 广州510641桂林541004珀斯澳大利亚WA6009广州510641

【摘要】 经验模态分解(EMD)的一个关键问题是处理边界效应。尽管目前除了Huang申请了NASA专利的边界处理方法,仍没有一个最终的解决方案,但工程上已经提出了多种处理方法。本文实现了工程上常用的5种EMD边界处理方法:线性外延,多项式拟合,镜像法,径向基(RBF)神经网络预测和AR预测方法,设计了一套消除了EMD处理中信号的相互作用及模式混淆影响的测试方法,并利用准周期信号和随机信号对它们的边界效应处理结果进行了定量测试。结果表明镜像法是目前相对最优的EMD边界处理方法。

【Abstract】 One of the most important problems in Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) applications is mitigation of the end effect. Except Huang’s patented approach several methods have been proposed. However, a final solution for this problem is yet to be found. In this paper five common end effect mitigation methods of EMD have been investigated, including linear extending method, polynomial fitting extending method, mirror extrema extending method, RBF neural network prediction method and AR prediction method. With a quasi-periodical signal and a stochastic signal as the test bed a quantitative test method was proposed for elimination of the mode confusion effect of EMD. The five end effect mitigation methods were quantitatively evaluated and the comparison shows that mirror extrema extending method is the best option among the five methods.

【基金】 广东自然科学基金(05006593);广西自然科学基金(0448035)资助课题
  • 【文献出处】 电子与信息学报 ,Journal of Electronics & Information Technology , 编辑部邮箱 ,2007年06期
  • 【分类号】TN911.7
  • 【被引频次】69
  • 【下载频次】676
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络